Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khorram-Abad, Iran
2 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Powdery mildew fungi (Erysiphales, Ascomycota) have emerged as a serious threat to landscape and ornamental plants. These disease agents infect green leaves, stems, sprouts and flowers through which premature wither and falling of leaves can be occurred. Flowers infected by powdery mildews lose their ornamental value. The genus and species level taxonomy of powdery mildews have been significantly changed based on new molecular and morphological approaches (Cook et al. 1997, Braun & Takamatsu 2000, Braun et al. 2002, Braun & Cook 2012). Many studies have been conducted by mycologists and plant pathologists, although research is still ongoing on taxonomy and several aspects of pathogenicity of this interesting group of fungi. Until now, no comprehensive study has been done on landscape and ornamental plants in Iran. However, sporadic publications show that these fungi are common on ornamental plants in the country (Sharifi et al. 2013, Sharifi et al. 2014, Khodaparast 2016).
Based on the status of the international center of ornamental plants (AIPH), Iran ranks 12th worldwide in terms of ornamental plants cultivation (http://aiph. org/statistical-yearbook/). In spite of vast areas under cultivation of ornamental plants, unfortunately, exports of these plants have not been satisfactory. Lack of enough information about pathogens of ornamental plants such as powdery mildew fungi is one of the challenges of producing and exporting of these plants. In this study, we have described and illustrated some powdery mildew species on ornamental plants from four provinces of Iran to identify the species by means of combined analyses of morphological and molecular data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection
Samples infected with powdery mildew fungi (disease agents covering green leaves, stems, sprouts with mycelium) were collected from four provinces of Iran during 2016-2018 (Isfahan, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari, Markazi and Lorestan) and transferred to the laboratory of Plant Pathology, University of Lorestan. All the specimen deposited in the University of Guilan Mycological Herbarium (GUM).
Morphological characterization
For microscopic analysis, different organs of the fungus were examined under an optical microscope, Olympus BH2. To examine asexual morphs, mycelia were strip off from the leaf surface using clear adhesive tape and mounted in a 50% lactic acid solution. For observation of sexual structures, chasmothecia were placed in 3 % NaOH solution. Along with morphological characteristics of sexual and asexual stages, host species names and other information related to the specimens were recorded. Measurements were conducted based on the data from 30 samples for each structure. All the images were provided by digital camera (Sony, DSH-HX) attached on microscope. The images were put together and were edited using Photoshop (Adobe Photoshop CS). Exact identification and confirmation of taxa were done using Braun (1987, 1995), Braun & Takamatsu (2000), Cook & Braun (2009) and Braun & Cook (2012).
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing
Total DNA was extracted from conidia, mycelia, and chasmothecia of powdery mildew fungi by the HotShot method (Montero-Pau et al. 2008). Universal primer set of ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) was used to amplify ITS region. The Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a Thermal Cycler in a total volume of 25 ml. The PCR mixtures contained 12.5 µl of master mix (RNA Biotech company, Iran), 1 µL of each primer (0.4 pmol/μL), 3 µL of DNA template and 7.5 µL of double-distilled water. The PCR amplicons were electrophoresed on 1.5 % agarose gels in TAE buffer. The PCR products were sent to a commercial sequencing provider (Tao Yang, Beijing, China) for direct sequencing.
Phylogenetic analysis
All the obtained sequences were analyzed and edited using MEGA7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016), and subsequently, compared with the available sequences in the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database using the BLASTN search. These sequences were aligned with other sequences retrieved from DNA databases using MUSCLE in MEGA 7 (Edgar 2004, Kumar et al. 2016). Phylogenetic trees were obtained using the minimum-evolution method in MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016). In the ME method, the evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method (Kimura 1980). All the ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair. The strength of the internal branches from the resulting trees was statistically tested by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates (Felsenstein 1985). The ITS sequences determined in this study were deposited in GenBank.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Powdery mildew fungi collected in this study belong to the genera including Erysiphe,Golovinomyces, Leveillula, Oidium, Podosphaera andSawadaea (Table 1). Comparison of the sequences showed that our sequences mostly were identical with some reliable sequences in GenBank (Fig. 1). Due to morphological complexity, molecular approached including ITS sequence and phylogenetic analysis were useful for identification of the species. Further information is given for each taxon under species description in taxonomic part.
Golovinomyces asperifolii (Erikss.) U. Braun & H.D. Shin, Mycobiology 46 (3): 198 (2018) Fig. 2
Mycelium amphigenous, on stems and sepals, dense, persistent, forming regular or irregular white patches, effuse; hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, 2.5–7.5 μm wide; conidiophores erect, arising from upper surface of hyphal mother cells, 100–200 μm long; foot-cells straight, cylindrical, 40–100 ´ 8–12.5 μm, foot-cells followed by 1–4 shorter cells, forming catenescent conidia; conidia ovoid to doliiform, 22–38 × 12–20 μm, length/width ratio 1.4–2.4, germ tubes Euoidium type. Teleomorph not found.
According to Braun & Cook (2012), members of Boraginaceae are infected with a single species Golovinomyces cynoglossi s. lat. Recently, this species has been divided to three species based on the phylogenetic analysis of rDNA ITS sequences and morphological re-examination (Braun et al. 2019). Blast search showed that our sequences is 100 % similar to G. asperifolii on Myosotis sylvatica (GLM-F079322, epitype). This is the first report of G. asperifoliion Nonea sp. in Iran.
Specimen examined. IRAN, Isfahan province, Isfahan, on Nonea sp., 18. May. 2018, K. Sharifi, (GUM 1696), GenBank accession number: MT621669, ITS.
Leveillula cleomes Simonyan & V.P. Heluta, Biol. Zh. Armenii 42(5): 481 (1989) Fig. 3
Chasmothecia gregarious to scattered, often immersed in dense mycelia, 130-200 μm, appendages usually well developed, mycelioid, simple, mostly interlaced with each other and with the mycelium, hyaline to light brown, asci obovoid-clavate to subcylindrical, 65-100 ´ 20-45 μm, ascospores ellipsoid-ovoid, colourless, 20-32 × 12-18 μm. Primary conidia subcylindrical, usually with parallel side which apically narrowed, wider in the upper half, , 50- 70 × 11.5- 17.5 μm, secondary conidia cylindrical, subcylindrical, sometimes slightly narrowed towards the base and slightly clavate , as large as the primary conidia, usually 55-75 × 11- 16.5 μm .
Based on the rDNA ITS sequences, this species is closely related to L. taurica (accession AB045000, from L. taurica on Zygophyllum fabago, type host of this species). However, the sequence of this specimen showed variation in three positions in ITS sequence from AB045000. Several ITS sequences have been recorded for Leveillula species in GenBank, however, this is the first record of ITS sequence for L. cleomes. There is one ambiguous record of Leveillula taurica on Cleome (Amano, 1986), but this is the first reliable record of L. cleomes on this plant which is identified by morphological and molecular characteristics.
Specimen examined. IRAN, Isfahan province, Isfahan, on Cleome sp., 21. June. 2018, K. Sharifi, (GUM 729), GenBank accession number: MT621677, ITS.
Podosphaera euphorbiae-helioscopiae (Tanda & Y. Nomura) U. Braun & S. Takam., Schlechtendalia 4: 28, (2000) Fig. 4.
Mycelium amphigenous, white on stem and leaves, frequently infection on terminal bud of stem that cause death of the bud, hyphae hyaline, persistent hyphae later turning brown with thin walled, 5- 7.5 μm wide, appressoria nipple-shaped, conidiophores erect, straight and flexuous, up to 280 μm, foot cell cylindrical, up to 45-100 ´ 7.5-10 μm, followed by 1-4 shorter cells, forming catenescent conidia, mostly 3-8 conidia per chain, conidia cylindrical, ellipsoid-oid, 20-57 ´ 9-14 μm, teleomorph not seen. Sharifi et al. (2013) have already reported this powdery mildew as P. euphorbiae-hirtae (U. Braun & Somani) U. Braun & Takam on this plant from Guilan province. However, this identification was only based on conidial state and without molecular examination. The ITS sequence of both specimens from Guilan and Markazi provinces showed 100% similarity. Blast search showed that the similarity of our sequences to ITS-rDNA sequence of some taxa deposited in GeneBank is more than 99% (Accession numbers: KY661086 Ellingham Unpublished; MN216223 Pei & Zhu unpublished). We found one reliable ITS sequence of P. euphorbiae-hirtae (AB040306, Hirata et al. 2000), another Podosphaera species on Euphorbiaceae, which is easily distinguishable from P. euphorbiae-helioscopiae on the basis of molecular data.
Specimen examined. IRAN, Markazi province, Mahalat, on Pedilianthus sp., 10. Aug. 2017, K. Sharifi, (GUM 1698), GenBank accession number: MT621672, ITS.
Table 1: Fungi included in this study, their host plants and corresponding GenBank accession numbers.
Taxa |
Host plant |
Vochers |
Genebak accessionnumbers |
Erysiphe Australiana |
Lagerstroemia indica |
GUM 1716 |
--- |
Erysiphe euonymicola |
Euonymus japonicus |
GUM 1719 |
--- |
Erysiphe howeana |
Oenothera biennis |
GUM 1714 |
--- |
Erysiphe multappendicis |
Berberis thunbergii |
GUM 1715 |
--- |
Erysiphe platani |
Platanus orientalis |
GUM 1718 |
--- |
Erysiphe rayssiae |
Spartium junceum |
GUM 1711 |
--- |
Erysiphe robiniae var. roboniae |
Robinia pseudoacacia |
GUM 1713 |
--- |
Erysiphe syringae- japonicae |
Syringa vulgaris |
GUM 1712 |
--- |
Erysiphe trifoliorum |
Trifolium sp. |
GUM 1717 |
--- |
Golovinomyces latisporus |
Zinnia elegans |
GUM 1707 |
--- |
Golovinomyces asperifolii |
Nonea sp. |
GUM 1696 |
MT621669 |
Golovinomyces biocellatus |
Mentha piperita |
GUM 1708 |
--- |
Golovinomyces orontii |
Antirrhinum majus |
GUM 1697 |
MT621670 |
Golovinomyces bolayi |
Abelmoschus esculentus |
GUM 1703 |
--- |
Golovinomyces orontii |
Viola pansy |
GUM 1704 |
--- |
Leveillula cleomes |
Cleome sp. |
GUM 729 |
MT621677 |
Leveillula taurica |
Catharanthus roseus |
GUM 731 |
--- |
Leveillula taurica |
Silybum marianum |
GUM 730 |
MT621676 |
Erysiphe sp. |
Cleome sp. |
GUM 1720 |
--- |
Podosphaera aphanis |
Fragaria vesca |
GUM 1721 |
--- |
Podosphaera erigerontis- canadensis |
Taraxacum sp. |
GUM 1710 |
--- |
Podosphaera euphorbiae-helioscopiae |
Pedilanthus sp. |
GUM 1698 |
MT621672 |
Podosphaera leucotricha |
Photinia sp. |
GUM 1699 |
MT621673 |
Podosphaera pannosa |
Rose sp. |
GUM 1705 |
--- |
Podosphaera xanthii |
Gerbera sp. |
GUM 1706 |
--- |
Podosphaera xanthii |
Dahlia pinnata |
GUM 1700 |
MT621674 |
Podosphaera xanthii |
Calendula officinalis |
GUM 1709 |
--- |
Podosphaera xanthii |
Coreopsis grandiflora |
GUM 1701 |
MT621675 |
Sawadaea negundinis |
Acer negundo |
GUM 1702 |
MT621671 |
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the rDNA ITS regions for 41 sequences of Golovinomyces, Podosphaera and Leveillula by minimum-evolution method. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. Numbers next to the branches shows the bootstraps values ≥ 50 %. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 7.0.
Fig. 2. Golovinomyces asperifoliia: Conidiophores, b: Germinated conidium, c: Conidia Scale bar =, d: Drawing conidia & conidiophore — Scale bars: a– b– c= 10μm, d= 20μm.
Fig. 3.Leveillula cleome a: Conidiophore, b: Conidia, c: Appendages, d: Chasmothecia with ascus, e: Ascus, f: germinated conidia, g: Drawing conidia & conidiophore. —Scale bars: a, f= 10 μm, b, c, d, e, g= 20μm.
Fig. 4. Podosphaera euphorbiae-helioscopiaea: Mycelium & conidiophores, b: Conidia, c: Conidiophores, d: Drawing from conidia & conidiophores. —Scale bars= 20μm.
The following species have already been described, but their host plants are new to Iran. Furthermore, ITS sequences for some taxa are provided.
Leveillula taurica (Lév.) G. Arnaud, Annls Épiphyt. 7: 92 (1921) Fig. 5
Specimen examined. IRAN, Isfahan province, Isfahan, on Catharanthus roseus, 10. Aug. 2017, K. Sharifi, (GUM 731). This is the first report of L. taurica on Catharanthus roseus in Iran.
Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takam., Schlechtendalia 4: 26 (2000) Fig. 6
Specimen examined. IRAN, Isfahan province, Isfahan, on Fragaria vesca, 10. Aug. 2017, K. Sharifi, (GUM 1721). This is the first report of P. aphanis on Fragaria vesca in Iran.
Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne) U. Braun & Shishkoff, Schlechtendalia 4: 31, (2000) Fig. 7
Already, Golovinomyces ambrosiae(Schwein.) U. Braun & R.T.A. Cook has been recorded on Dahlia from Iran (Khodaparast 2016). This is the first report of P. xanthii on Dahlia pinnata in Iran. Specimen examined. IRAN, Isfahan province, Isfahan, on Dahlia pinnata, 12. June. 2018, K. Sharifi, (GUM 1700), GenBank accession number: MT621674, ITS.
Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne) U. Braun & Shishkoff, Schlechtendalia 4: 31, (2000). Fig. 8
Cho et al. (2016) have already reported Podosphaera xanthiion Coreopsis verticillata from Korea. The blast search showed 100 % similarity to several accessions such as: AB525914.1 (from Calendula officinalis, Takamatsu et al. 2010); AB040349.1 (from Syneilesis palmata, Hirata et al. 2000) LC270781.1 (from Cosmos sulphureus, submitted by Meeboon & Takamatsu, unpublished). All of these sequences assigned to P. xanthii.
Specimen examined. IRAN, Isfahan province, Isfahan, on Coreopsis grandiflora, 6. May. 2018, K. Sharifi, (GUM 1701), GenBank accession number: MT621675, ITS.
Fig. 5. Leveillula tauricaa: Asci & Appendages, b: Primary conidia, c: Conidia germination Appresorium, d: Chasmothecia , e: Secondary conidia & conidiophore , f: Catharanthus roseus. —Scale bars= 20μm.
Fig. 6. Podosphaera aphanis a: Conidiophores, b: Conidia — Scale bars= A= 20 μm, B= 10μm.
Fig. 7. Podosphaera xanthii a: Conidiophores, b: Conidia, c: Germinated conidium, d: Drawing conidia & conidiophore. —Scale bars = 20μm.
Fig. 8. Podosphaera xanthiia: Conidiophores, b: Conidia, c: Coreopsis grandiflora. —Scale bars= 20μm.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank those who help us in this project, especially RNA Biotechnology Company for kindly providing primers.