Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Department of Plant Protection, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
The genus Pythium Pringsh. is a highly diverse, cosmopolitan and heterogeneous group containing more than 230 described species (Hyde et al.2014). Identifying the species of Pythium has often arisen difficulties to researchers due to various reasons such as the absence of certain structures for morphological identification, the lack of identification keys for the species, pleomorphism of the sexual and asexual structures, and the lack of molecular identification data for the species. Molecular phylogenetic studies categorized Pythium spp. into clades with diverse morphological characteristics (de Cock & Lévesque 2004, Villa et al. 2006, Robideau et al.2011, Hyde et al.2014). Uzuhashi et al.(2010) believe that Pythium species belonging to the clades E to J sensu Lévesque & de Cock (2004) should be transferred into two new genera, Globisporangium Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish (clades E to J, including a part of clade H) and Elongisporangium Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish (another part of clade H) and other species located in the clades A to D (Lévesque & de Cock 2004) should be remained as Pythium sensu stricto.They also described two other genera: Ovatisporangium Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish (clade K sensu Lévesque & de Cock (2004), a later synonym to Phytopythium)and Pilasporangium Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish (a completely new clade with only one species)among Pythium sensu lato species. However, these genera are still a matter of controversy.
Identification of the morphological features of various species has been a major concern of many researchers (Bala et al. 2010a). Many Pythium species show intraspecific variations for some specific morphological features. Although, phylogenetic analyses using DNA sequences along with other molecular techniques have significantly assisted in the identification of unknown Pythium species, morphological traits comprise fundamental importance to support the identifications defined by molecular techniques.
Pythium plurisporium Abad, Shew, Grand & L.T. Lucas was first isolated from bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) in North Carolina and formally described as a new species belong to the clade B of ITS phylogenetic tree (Abad et al.1995). This species was characterized by possessing multiple oospores within oogonium. Pythium plurisporium has been reported to be morphologically close to P. multisporum Poitras according to the production of more than one oospore per oogonium; however, the asymmetrical shape of oogonia in P. plurisporium, as well as the existence of swollen elements below oogonial stalk, separate it from P. multisporum. Moreover, P. multisporum belongs to the clade E of Pythium ITS phylogenetic tree (Lèvesque & de Cock 2004), whereas, P. plurisporium is located in the clade B of Pythium ITS phylogenetic tress (Lèvesque & de Cock 2004; Robideau et al. 2011). Pythium plurisporium isolates has been recovered from diseased root and crown of bentgrass. However, it was reported as a secondary colonizer of infected roots. Since its first isolation, no other records have been presented until 2017 (Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2017). During the investigation of rice paddy fields of Fars province, Iran, 1129 Pythium isolates were recovered among which seven isolates were morphologically and phylogenetically similar to P. plurisporium (Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2017). Although, five other isolates were morphologically identified as a new species, phylogenetic analyses revealed that they belong to P. plurisporium. These isolates’ morphological features were completely in the conflict of the original description. These controversial findings led to the conclusion that there could be some intraspecies pleomorphism in the morphological features of the isolates assigned to P. plurisporium,which is discussed in this paper.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sampling and isolation
Sampling was randomly conducted from rhizosphere soil, water ponds and rice seedlings from different rice paddy fields and ornamental trees of Fars province, Iran from 2013 to 2018. Coordinates were recorded for each field by Global Positioning System (GPS) (Table 1). Samples were transported to the Mycology Laboratory of the Department of Plant Protection, Shiraz University. Being washed with distilled water, the rice seedlings were placed on oomycetes semi-selective medium CMA-PARP (Ground corn extract 40 g/L; agar 15 g/L; amended with 10 µg/mL pimaricin, 200 µg/mL ampicillin, 10 µg/mL rifampicin and 25 µg/mL PCNB) (Jeffers & Martin 1986). One hundred grams of each soil sample was placed in a plastic container and flooded with tap water to 1 cm above the soil surface (Tan 1996). Isolates were recovered from either soil or water samples by baiting with 5-mm surface-sterilized bitter orange (Citrus aurantium L.) leaf disks or 5 mm pieces of sterile meadow grass (Poa annua L.) at 25 °C every 8 h for 40 h in total, and plating on CMA-PARP. Isolates were purified by hyphal tip method on water agar (WA, Agar 10 g/L) and stored on CMA (Ground corn extract 40 g/L; agar 15 g/L) slopes at 15 °C.
Morphological characterization
To observe asexual organs (sporangia, vesicle, and zoospores), isolates were transferred to CMA containing sterile hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) seeds or turfgrass (Poa sp.) on agar (Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa & Banihashemi 2005) for 24 h. Hemp seeds or turfgrass were then transferred to Petri dishes containing distilled water (Ho et al. 2012), sterile soil extract (McLeod et al. 2009) or Schmitthenner solution (Schmitthenner 1973) under fluorescent light for 24 h and were checked every 8 h for six times. Sporangial formation was examined using French bean agar (FBA, French bean extract 30 g/L; agar 15 g/L) (Jeffers & Martin 1968) and sterile soil extract (Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa et al.2008). Sexual organs were obtained with hemp seed agar (HSA, ground hemp seed extract 60 g/L; agar 15 g/L) and carrot agar (CA, carrot extract 250 g/L; agar 15 g/L) incubated in darkness (Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa & Banihashemi 2005). To study colony morphology, isolates were grown on CMA, HSA, CA, potato-dextrose agar (PDA, potato extract 300 g/L; dextrose 20 g/L; agar 15 g/L) and malt extract agar (MEA, Malt extract 25 g/L; agar 15 g/L) (Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa & Banihashemi 2005). Five mm diameter plugs from the edge of a 3 d old culture were placed on Petri dishes containing 20 mm of a particular test media. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. Temperature-growth relationships were tested on PDA with three replicate plates per isolate and incubated at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 °C. The growth rate was recorded 2–12 d after the onset of linear growth.
Sequencing and phylogenetic analyses
The method described by Mirsoleimani & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa (2013) was employed for DNA extraction. Potato extract broth (extract of 300 g/L boiled potato in distilled water) was used for the growth of isolates. Mycelia were harvested, freeze-dried, and DNA extracts were obtained using a DNGTM-PLUS extraction kit (Sinagene, Iran) according to the manufacture’s instruction. The DNA quality was examined with an MD-1000 Nanodrop machine (NanoDrop Technologies, USA). The primers used for amplification and sequencing of nuclear (Internal transcribed spacers 1, 2 and 5.8S region of rDNA (ITS-rDNA) and β-tubulin gene (Btub)) as well as mitochondrial (cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (cox2)) loci are listed in table 2. The PCR conditions for these loci are listed in table 3. PCR products were purified and sequenced with the primers used for amplification by a dye terminator cycle (Bioneer, South Korea). Sequenced data were deposited into GeneBank and accession numbers were obtained.
Resulting sequences were edited by Bioedit (Hall 1999). The sequence alignment of the amplicons together with data extracted from GenBank (Supplementary Table 1) was conducted by ClustalX (Thompson et al.1997) with subsequent visual adjustment. To reconstruct the phylogenetic trees, Bayesian inference analyses on individual and concatenated ITS, Btub and cox2 loci were carried out with MrBayes v. 3.1 (Rounquist & Huelsenbeck 2003), imposing a general time-reversible (GTR) substitution model with gamma (G) and proportion of invariable site (I) parameters to accommodate variable rates across sites. Bayesian analyses were conducted with the same data set according to Safaeifarahani et al.(2015). The best nucleotide substitution model was determined by MrModelTest v. 2.3 (Nylander 2004). Two independent runs of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) using four chains were run over 1,000,000 generations. Trees were saved each 1000 generations, resulting in 10001 trees. Burn-in was set at 5% generations. Pythium nagaii S. Ito & Tokun.was chosen as an outgroup. Phylogenetic trees were edited and displayed with TREEGRAPH (Stöver & Müller 2010). Partition homogeneity tests were conducted on combined nuclear and mitochondrial gene alignments by PAUP* 4.0a136 (Swofford 2002) using 100 replicates and heuristic general search option. Alignments and trees were submitted to TreeBASE (http://www.treebase.org).
Pathogenicity
Resulting isolates were evaluated for their ability to cause stunting, post- and pre-emergence damping-off and seed rot, and their pathogenicity on rice plants. Inoculum preparation was conducted by the method described by Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa (2019) with mycelium inoculated vermiculite amended with 120 mL/L hempseed extract (extract of 60 g boiled hemp seed).
For pre-emergence damping-off tests, rice seeds were washed and planted in sandy loam (1:1) soil (500 mL) amended with 10 mL inoculum. Post-emergence damping-off was examined on 20 d old seedlings inoculated with 10 mL inoculum per pot (500 mL soil). Control pots contained only hempseed extract amended vermiculite. Symptoms were monitored two weeks after inoculation. To evaluate the ability of various isolates in the colonization of root and crown tissues of rice, after being cut into 0.5 mm pieces, roots and crown were washed, blotted and placed on the CMA-PARP medium at 25 °C. The growth rate was checked every 12 h during a week (Afeck et al. 1990).
RESULTS
Pythium plurisporium isolates from Iran
A total of 12 isolates of Pythium spp. With filamentous sporangia were recovered from rice paddy fields of Fars province. These isolates formed two distinct morphological groups: the first group consists of seven isolates which were morphologically similar to the original description of P. plurisporium (Abad et al. 1996). Morphometric results can be seen in table 4. The representative sequenced isolate of the group was located in the vicinity of P. plurisporium in Clade B of ITS phylogenetic tree (Lévesque & de Cock 2004) (Fig. 1).
Some other recovered isolates from Iran were morphologically different from the others as well as the original description of P. plurisporium.The representative sequenced isolates of this group also appeared as P. plurisporium both in ITS and combined gene trees (Fig. 1 and 2). Variations have been observed in these isolates (table 4). The morphological features of both groups (i.e. Group I and Group II) are described below.
Morphological Group I
Colonies on PDA, MEA, HSA, and CA show rosette pattern, on CMA with uniform pattern (Fig. 3a). Main hyphae up to 6 µm wide. Sporangia are filamentous, slightly inflated with long discharge tube (Fig. 4a). Sporangia were abundantly formed in liquid media after 10 h (Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2017). Vesicles and zoospores are produced on sterile hempseed in water cultures after 12 h at 25 °C. Oogonia are obpyriform, smooth, terminal, aplerotic, consisting of at most two oospores, (Fig. 4b–f), and variable in size (table 4).
Table 1. List of Pythium plurisporium isolates recovered from rice paddy fields of Fars Province of Iran with their GenBank accession numbers.
Isolate Code |
Date |
Location |
Substrate |
Coordinates |
Accession No. |
|||
Latitude |
Longitude |
ITS |
Tub |
Cox2 |
||||
Pythium plurisporium Group I |
||||||||
Kb440 |
16-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa Pond water |
30°20.426'N |
052°16.460'E |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
KC12 |
20-May-14 |
Ramjard |
Oryzae sativa root |
30°05.671'N |
052°35.522'E |
KX228082 |
N/A |
N/A |
Kh419 |
16-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa Nursery soil |
30°17.131'N |
052°19.039'E |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Kh423 |
16-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa Nursery soil |
30°17.412'N |
052°18.682'E |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Kh424 |
16-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa Nursery soil |
30°17.396'N |
052°18.698'E |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Kh425 |
16-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa Pond water |
30°17.395'N |
052°18.696'E |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Kh426 |
16-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa Pond water |
30°17.392'N |
052°18.693'E |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Pythium plurisporium Group II |
||||||||
045-1 |
1-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa root |
30°16.545'N |
052°19.659'E |
KX228085 |
KX228110 |
KX228123.2 |
SS |
1-Nov-15 |
Ramjard |
Oryzae sativa crown |
30°06.568'N |
052°34.164'E |
KX228084 |
KX228111 |
KX228122 |
PS |
1-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa root |
30°17.421'N |
052°18.692'E |
KX228086 |
KX228112 |
KX228121 |
HS |
1-Aug-14 |
Kamfiruz |
Oryzae sativa Soil |
30°18.199'N |
052°17.635'E |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Supplementary Table 1. GenBank accession numbers of Pythium species used for phylogenetic reconstructions.
Species |
Isolate Code |
Substrate/Host |
GenBank Accession no. |
||
ITS |
cox2 |
Btub |
|||
P. afertile |
LEV 2066 |
Turf grass |
HQ643416 |
KJ595440 |
KJ595563 |
P. angustatum |
CBS 522.74 |
Soil |
AY598623 |
KJ595387 |
KJ595511 |
P. apleroticum |
CBS 772.81 |
Nymphyoides petata |
AY598631 |
KJ595400 |
KJ595524 |
P. aquatile |
CBS 215.80 |
Soil |
AY598632 |
KJ595355 |
KJ595481 |
P. aristosporum |
ATCC 11101 |
Triticum aestivum |
AY598627 |
AB095060 |
DQ071297 |
P. arrhenomanes |
1994-15 |
Unknown |
AY598628 |
AF196587 |
KJ595451 |
P. capillosum |
CBS 222.94 |
Soil |
AY598635 |
KJ595360 |
KJ595485 |
P. catenulatum |
CBS 842.68 |
Turf grass |
AY598675 |
KJ595404 |
KJ595528 |
P. coloratum |
CBS 154.64 |
Soil (tree nursery) |
AY598633 |
KJ595346 |
KJ595474 |
P. conidiophorum |
CBS 223.88 |
Soil |
AY598629 |
KJ595361 |
KJ595486 |
P. diclinum |
CBS 664.79 |
Beta vulgaris |
AY598690 |
KJ595394 |
KJ595518 |
P. dissimile |
CBS 155.64 |
Pinus radiata |
AY598681 |
KJ595347 |
KJ595475 |
P. dissotocum |
CBS 166.68 |
Triticum aestivum |
AY598634 |
KJ595351 |
KJ595479 |
P. flevoense |
CBS 234.72 |
Soil |
AY598691 |
KJ595363 |
KJ595488 |
P. folliculosum |
CBS 220.94 |
Unknown |
HQ643540 |
N/A |
MK752994 |
P. graminicola |
CBS 327.62 |
Saccharum officinarum |
AY598625 |
AF196593 |
KJ595452 |
P. inflatum |
CBS 168.68 |
Unknown |
AY598626 |
KJ595352 |
DQ071313 |
P. kashmirense |
CBS 122908 |
Soil |
HQ643671 |
KJ595429 |
KJ595553 |
P. longipapillum |
CBS 141231 |
Oryzae sativa |
KX228104 |
KX228128 |
KX228116 |
P. lutarium |
CBS 222.88 |
Soil |
HQ643682 |
KJ595359 |
KJ595484 |
P. marinum |
CBS 750.96 |
Soil |
AY598689 |
KJ595398 |
KJ595522 |
P. myriotylum |
CBS 254.70 |
Arachis hypogaea |
AY598678 |
KJ595365 |
KJ595490 |
P. nagaii |
CBS 779.96 |
Soil |
AY598705 |
KJ595402 |
JX397970 |
P. oopapillum |
CBS 124053 |
Cucumis sativus |
FJ655174 |
KJ595431 |
KJ595556 |
P. pachycaule |
CBS 227.88 |
Soil |
AY598687 |
KJ595362 |
KJ595487 |
P. pectinolyticum |
CBS 122643 |
Unknown |
MK015671 |
N/A |
KJ595469 |
P. periilum |
CBS 169.68 |
Unknown |
AY598683 |
N/A |
N/A |
P. phragmitis |
CBS 117104 |
Soil (Phragmites australis) |
HQ643746 |
AJ890351 |
EU152854 |
P. plurisporium |
CBS 100530 |
Agrostis |
AY598684 |
KJ595405 |
KJ595529 |
P. pyrilobum |
CBS 158.64 |
Pinus radiata |
AY598636 |
KJ595349 |
KJ595477 |
P. rhizo-oryzae |
CBS 119169 |
Soil |
HQ643757 |
KJ595420 |
KJ595545 |
P. rishiriense |
CBS 139278 |
Water |
AB998878 |
N/A |
N/A |
P. salpingophorum |
CBS 471.50 |
Lupinus angustifolius |
AY598630 |
KJ595384 |
KJ595508 |
P. scleroteichum |
CBS 294.37 |
Ipomoea batatas |
AY598680 |
KJ595370 |
KJ595495 |
P. sukuiense |
CBS 110030 |
Soil |
HQ643836 |
KJ595408 |
KJ595532 |
P. sulcatum |
CBS 603.73 |
Daucus carota |
AY598682 |
KJ595393 |
KJ595517 |
P. tardicrescens |
LEV 1534 |
Turf grass |
HQ643855 |
KJ595439 |
KJ595562 |
P. torulosum |
CBS 316.33 |
Grass |
AY598624 |
KJ595374 |
KJ595499 |
P. tracheiphilum |
CBS 323.65 |
Unknown |
AY598677 |
KJ595375 |
N/A |
P. vanterpoolii |
CBS 295.37 |
Triticum aestivum |
AY598685 |
KJ595371 |
KJ595496 |
P. volutum |
CBS 699.83 |
Triticum and Hordeum |
AY598686 |
KJ595397 |
KJ595521 |
P. zingiberis |
CBS 21682 |
Unknown |
HQ643973 |
DQ071402 |
DQ071349 |
Table 2. List of primers used in this study.
Target DNA |
Primer name |
Primer sequence (5ʹ→3ʹ) |
Reference |
ITSa |
ITS4 |
TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC |
White et al. 1990 |
ITS6 |
GAAGGTGAAGTCGTAACAAGG |
Cooke et al. 2000 |
|
Btubb |
BT5 |
GTATCATGTGCACGTACTCGG |
Villa et al. 2006 |
BT6 |
CAAGAAAGCCTTACGACGGA |
Villa et al.2006 |
|
cox2c |
FM66 |
TAGGATTTCAAGATCCTGC |
Villa et al. 2006 |
FM58 |
CCACAAATTTCACTACATTGA |
Villa et al. 2006 |
aInternal transcribed spacers 1, 2 and 5.8S gene of rDNA. b β-tubulin. c cytochrome c oxidase subunit II.
Table 3. PCR conditions for primers used in this study.
Final expansion |
Expansion |
Annealing |
Desaturation |
Number of cycles |
Initial desaturation |
Gene |
72 (600) |
72 (50) |
55 (25) |
95 (20) |
30 |
95 (120)d |
ITSa |
72 (600) |
72 (50) |
63 (25) |
95 (20) |
30 |
95 (120) |
Btubb |
72 (600) |
72 (50) |
52 (25) |
95 (20) |
30 |
95 (120) |
cox2c |
aInternal transcribed spacers 1, 2 and 5.8S region of rDNA. b β-tubulin. c cytochrome c oxidase subunit II. d Temperature ‘ºC’ (time s’)
None of the isolates produced more than two oospores in a single oogonium. Antheridia are 6–12 per oogonium, crook-necked, mostly monoclinous, and sometimes diclinous, with a terminal contact, paragynous (Fig. 4b–f). Antheridium origination in monoclinous oospores is near oogonium stalk. Although no swollen elements were observed in the oogonial stalk, the stalk was swollen itself (Fig. 4). None of these isolates produced any papillae on oogonium. Oospores are mostly globose, aplerotic, up to 30 µm in diam, with a wall which is up to 3 µm thick. Morphometric results are shown in table 4. Colonies on PDA have an average radial growth rate of 5.5 mm/d at 15 °C, 10 mm/d at 20 °C, 25 mm/d at 25 °C, 27 mm/d at 30 °C and 35 °C, 7 mm/d at 40 °C and no growth at 5 °C and 10 °C (Fig. 7). Cardinal temperatures: optimum 35 °C, minimum 15 °C, and maximum 40 °C.
Specimens examined. Iran, Fars Province: Kamfiruz, (30°20.426'N−052°16.460'E), from pond water of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug. 2014, F. Salmaninezhad Kb440; Kamfiruz, (30°17.131'N−052°19.039'E), from nursery soil of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug. 2014, F. Salmaninezhad Kh416; Kamfiruz, (30°17. 412'N −052°18.682'E), from nursery soil of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug. 2014, F. Salmaninezhad Kh423; Kamfiruz, (30°17.396'N−052°18.698'E), from nursery soil of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug. 2014, F. Salmaninezhad Kh424; Kamfiruz, (30°17.395'N−052°18.696'E), from pond water of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug. 2014, F. Salmaninezhad Kh425; Kamfiruz, (30°17.392'N−052°18.693'E), from pond water of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug. 2014, F. Salmaninezhad Kh426; Ramjard, (30°05.671'N−052°35.522'E), from root of Oryzae sativa, 20 May 2014, F. Salmaninezhad KC12. GenBank: ITS = KX228082.
All isolates of the Group I were extremely pathogenic on rice seedlings causing post-emergence damping-off (Fig. 5a; table 5). The representative isolate of this grouped was located in the vicinity of P. plurisporium in the Clade B of ITS phylogenetic tree (Lèvesque & de Cock 2004).
Morphological Group II
Colonies on MEA show no specific pattern, on PDA, HSA and CA show an intermediate pattern between radial to rosette and on CMA show an approximately radial pattern (Fig. 3b). Main hyphae have 2.9–4.3 (av. 3.2) µm width. Sporangia are filamentous, slightly inflated with a rather long discharge tube (Fig. 6a). Vesicles and zoospores are formed plentifully on sterile hempseed in water cultures after 12–24 hours at 20–25 °C. Oogonia are globose, smooth, terminal and intercalary, 25.9–27.2 (av. 26.2) µm. More than 50 % of the oogonia have one or two papillae which are 1.5–6.7 (av. 2.2) µm long (Fig. 6b).
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Pythium plurisporium from paddy fields of Fars province among 42 Pythium species based on the comparison of internal transcribed spacers 1, 2 and 5.8S region of rDNA sequences in a Bayesian probability tree. Numbers above the branches represent posterior probability based on Bayesian analysis. Pythium nagaii is used as an outgroup taxon.
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Pythium plurisporium from paddy fields of Fars Province among 36 Pythium species based on the analysis of multigene genealogies of nuclear (ITS and Btub) and mitochondrial (cox2) sequences. Values on branches are posterior probability based on Bayesian analysis greater or equal to 0.5. Pythium nagaii is used as an outgroup taxon.
Fig. 3. Colony morphology of examined groups of Pythium plurisporium in this study: a. Group I; b. Group II after 24 h on various media at 25 °C; top (from left to right): carrot agar, malt extract agar and potato-dextrose agar; bottom (from left to right): cornmeal agar and hempseed agar.
Fig. 4. Morphology of Pythium plurisporium (Group I). a. filamentous, slightly inflated sporangium; b. oospore with monoclinous and diclinous antheridia; c. ellipsoid aplerotic oogonium; d. aplerotic oogonium with two oospores; e. oogonium with swollen stalk; f. Oogonium with 10 to 12 paragynous antheridia. — Scale bars = b-f: 10 µm, a: 20 µm .
Fig. 5. Pathogenicity tests on roots and crown of rice (Oryzae sativa) by representatives of Pythium plurisporium groups. a. Group I (KC12) which causes post-emergence damping-off and root rot (left: control; right: infected crown and roots). b. Group II (045-1) which causes severe root and crown rot; pre- and post-emergence damping-off (left: control; right: infected crown and root).
Fig. 6. Morphological structures of Pythium plurisporium (Group II). A. filamentous slightly inflated sporangium; b. aplerotic oospore with two long papillae; c. aplerotic oospore with a papilla and paragynous antheridium. — Scale bars = a: 20 µm, b-c: 10 µm.
Fig. 7. Average radial growth rate of Pythium plurisoprium isolates from Iran on potato-dextrose agar at different temperatures; Group I (upper diagram) Group II (lower diagram).
Antheridia are 2–5 per oogonium, crook-necked, mostly diclinous, and sometimes monoclinous, with a terminal contact, paragynous (Fig. 6c). Antheridium origination in monoclinous oospores is near oogonium stalk. Oospores are globose, aplerotic, 22.3–23.2 (av. 23.0) µm with a wall which is 1.3–2.1 (av. 1.5) µm thick. Morphometric results are shown in table 4. Colonies on PDA have an average radial growth rate of 3.5 mm/d at 15 °C, 5 mm/d at 20 °C, 10 mm/d at 25 °C, 11 mm/d at 30 °C and 35 °C, 2 mm/d at 40 °C and no growth at 5 °C and 10 °C (Fig. 7). Cardinal temperatures: optimum 35 °C, minimum 15 °C, and maximum 40 °C.
Phylogenetic analyses using both nuclear (ITS, Btub) and mitochondrial (cox2) loci revealed that this taxon is located in Clade B in the vicinity of P. plurisporium in a separate monophyletic group (Fig. 1 and 2).
Specimens examined. IRAN,FARS PROVINCE: Kamfiruz (30°16.545'N−052°19.659'E), from the roots of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug 2014, F. Salmaninezhad 045-1 (CBS 140940). GenBank: ITS = KX228085; Btub = KX228110; cox2 = KX228123.2. IRAN,FARS PROVINCE: Ramjard (30°06.568'N−052°34.164'E), from Oryzae sativa crown, 9 Nov 2015, F. Salmaninezhad SS. GenBank: ITS = KX228074; Btub = KX228111; cox2 = KX228122. IRAN, FARS PROVINCE: Kamfiruz (30°17.421'N−052°18.692'E), from root of Oryzae sativa, 16 Aug 2014, F. Salmaninezhad PS. GenBank: ITS = KX228086; Btub = KX228112; cox2 = KX228121. IRAN, FARS PROVINCE, Kamfiruz (30°18.199'N−052°17.635'E), from rhizosphere soil of Oryzae sativa paddy fields, Aug 2014, F. Salmaninezhad, HS.
All isolates of the Group II were severe pathogens of rice seedlings, causing pre- and post-emergence damping-off, as well as root, crown, and seed rot (table 5).
Note. The length of papilla was mainly more than 3 µm in the isolate 045-1. Generally, oogonia in this isolate (i.e. 045-1) contained more than one papilla. However, more than 60% of oogonia had only one papilla in other isolates.
DISCUSSION
Among 1129 Pythium isolates recovered from rice paddy fields of Fars Province, Iran, 12 isolates were assigned to P. plurisporium (Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2017). These isolates formed two distinct morphological groups: Group I consists of isolates KC12, Kb440, Kh419, Kh423, Kh424, Kh425, and Kh426. These isolates were recovered from rice root, pond water, and nursery soil (Table 1). All the isolates produced 1 to 2 oospores per oogonium. Colony morphology on all examined media was rosette form, except for CMA, which was uniform.This was in contrast with the original description of P. plurisporium which was reported to be chrysanthemum on CA and CMA (Abad et al. 1996).
Table 4. Comparison of Pythium plurisporium isolates from the original description (North Carolina) and Iran isolates.
Characters |
Isolates |
||||||||||||||
Abad et al. 1996 |
Pythium plurisporium Group I |
Pythium plurisporium Group II |
|||||||||||||
L39 |
L143 |
L147 |
Kh426 |
Kh425 |
Kh424 |
Kh423 |
Kh419 |
Kb440 |
KC12 |
045-1 |
HS |
PS |
SS |
||
Colony morphology on PDA |
No data |
No data |
No data |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Int. |
Rad. |
Int. |
Int. |
|
Colony morphology on CA |
Chry. |
Chry. |
Chry. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Int. |
Int. |
Ros. |
Int. |
|
Colony morphology on HSA |
No data |
No data |
No data |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Int. |
Int. |
Int. |
Chry. |
|
Colony morphology on MEA |
No data |
No data |
No data |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
Ros. |
N/P. |
N/P. |
N/P. |
N/P. |
|
Colony morphology on CMA |
Chry. |
Chry. |
Chry. |
Uni. |
Uni. |
Uni. |
Uni. |
Uni. |
Uni. |
Uni. |
App. Rad. |
Rad. |
Rad. |
Uni. |
|
Growth on PCA (mm/d) |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
27 |
25 |
24 |
27 |
25 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Sporangia |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
|
Hyphae (µm) |
5-6.25 |
5-6.25 |
5-6.25 |
5.168-6.992 |
5.535-7.004 |
4.783-6.524 |
4.003-6.052 |
4.993-7.024 |
4.914-6.012 |
5.003-6.312 |
2.9–4.3 |
2.7–4.0 |
2.8–4.4 |
2.9–4.2 |
|
Hyphal rings (µm) |
50 |
50 |
50 |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
Appressoria |
Rare |
Rare |
Rare |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
Sporangia |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
|
Hyphae (µm) |
5-6.25 |
5-6.25 |
5-6.25 |
5.168-6.992 |
5.535-7.004 |
4.783-6.524 |
4.003-6.052 |
4.993-7.024 |
4.914-6.012 |
5.003-6.312 |
2.9–4.3 |
2.7–4.0 |
2.8–4.4 |
2.9–4.2 |
|
Hyphal rings (µm) |
50 |
50 |
50 |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
Appressoria |
Rare |
Rare |
Rare |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
Sporangia |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
|
Hyphae (µm) |
5-6.25 |
5-6.25 |
5-6.25 |
5.168-6.992 |
5.535-7.004 |
4.783-6.524 |
4.003-6.052 |
4.993-7.024 |
4.914-6.012 |
5.003-6.312 |
2.9–4.3 |
2.7–4.0 |
2.8–4.4 |
2.9–4.2 |
|
Hyphal rings (µm) |
50 |
50 |
50 |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
Appressoria |
Rare |
Rare |
Rare |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
Sporangia |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Lobate |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
Fila. Slightly Infla. |
|
Antheridia type |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mono-Dic |
Mostly Dic. |
Mostly Dic. |
Mostly Dic. |
Mostly Dic. |
|
Antheridia per oogonium |
5–8 |
5–8 |
5–8 |
6–12 |
6–12 |
6–12 |
6–12 |
6–12 |
6–12 |
6–12 |
2–5 |
2–5 |
2–5 |
2–5 |
|
Antheridia attachment |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
Para. |
|
Antheridia size (µm) |
6-8 × 12-17 |
6-8 × 12-17 |
6-8 × 12-17 |
5.993*13.902-8.831*18.083 |
6.071*13.135-8.913*18.325 |
6.083*14.910-8.120*18.544 |
7.503*15.993-10.030*21.231 |
6.989*14.068-9.025*20.001 |
6.921*13.015-8.531*18.603 |
6.042*13.031-8.515*18.407 |
6.0 * 14.0–8.4 * 16.7 |
5.8 * 12.7–8.0 * 15.2 |
6.0 * 14.2–8.0 * 16.0 |
6.0 * 13.9–8.3 * 15.7 |
|
Oospore shape |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Mostly Glo. |
Glo. |
Glo. |
Glo. |
Glo. |
|
Oospore size (µm) |
12.1-25 |
12.1-25 |
12.1-25 |
23.067-37.242 |
19.063-27.246 |
20.357-38.962 |
11.351-28.585 |
14.368-30.005 |
14.782-28.359 |
12.143-24.805 |
22.3–23.2 |
21.9‒23.0 |
22.5–23.2 |
22.5–23.5 |
|
Oospore wall (µm) |
1.25-2.50 |
1.25-2.50 |
1.25-2.50 |
2.411 |
3.146 |
2.098 |
2.984 |
3.014 |
3.062 |
2.143 |
1.5±0.5 |
1.3±1.0 |
1.5±0.5 |
1.5±0.5 |
|
Table 5. Pathogenicity results of the Pythium plurisporium isolates examined in this study.
Species |
Isolate |
Pathogenicity on rice |
Symptom |
Host tissue colonization* |
||||
Post-emergence damping-off (%) |
Pre-emergence damping-off (%) |
Seed rot (%) |
Stunting (%) |
No growth (%) |
||||
Pythium plurisporium Group I |
||||||||
|
Kb440 |
+ |
55 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
+ |
|
KC12 |
+ |
60 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
+ |
|
Kh424 |
+ |
55 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
+ |
|
Kh425 |
+ |
60 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
+ |
|
Kh426 |
+ |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
+ |
|
Kh423 |
+ |
65 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
+ |
|
Kh419 |
+ |
65 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
+ |
Pythium plurisporium Group II |
||||||||
|
HS |
+ |
80 |
60 |
50 |
50 |
60 |
+ |
|
045-1 |
+ |
90 |
70 |
60 |
50 |
40 |
+ |
|
PS |
+ |
80 |
50 |
40 |
60 |
50 |
+ |
|
SS |
+ |
70 |
50 |
50 |
40 |
40 |
+ |
In our study of this group, total oogonial size was larger than the first description (table 4). No hyphal rings or appressoria was observed in our isolates. This was in contrast with the isolates described by Abad et al. (1996) where hyphal rings were observed. Iran’s isolates’ total oospore, oogonium, and antheridium size were larger than North Carolina’s (Tble 4). Furthermore, the first report described P. plurisporium as a species with subglobose oogonia; however, our isolates produced obpyriform oogonia. The original description of P. plurisporium reported that 4 to 8 antheridia exist per oogonium; whereas, we’ve observed more antheridia (6 to 12 per oogonium). On the other hand, variation between these isolates has also been observed (i.e. antheridial and oogonial size as well as growth rate on PCA) (TABLE 4). The sequenced isolate appeared in Clade B of ITS phylogenetic tree (Lèvesque & de Cock 2004), as P. plurisporium.
Group II included the isolates 045-1, SS, PS, and HS. All isolates produced filamentous, slightly inflated to dendroid sporangia, aplerotic oospores with 2–5 paragynous, crook-necked antheridia per oogonium. In contrast to P. plurisporium original description, these isolates never produced more than one oospore in a single oogonium (FIG. 2). Moreover, the existence of one to two papillae on oogonial surface was only observed in this group of isolates. Globose oogonia and smaller size of oogonium and antheridium were other distinct characteristics from the original description of P. plurisporium. Furthermore, this group’s growth rate on PCA was relatively slower than group I and the first description of P. plurisporium. Besides, this group had variable colony morphology on different media (TABLE 4). However, the phylogenetic analyses of this group showed a very close relationship with original P. plurisporium (see below).
Pathogenicity test results also confirmed the existence of two groups within P. plurisporium examined isolates. Despite being able to colonize root and crown tissues, Group I isolates could only cause post-emergence damping-off; whereas Group II isolates could severely cause pre- and post-emergence damping-off, stunting, seed rot, and prohibit seedlings’ growth (TABLE 5).
These isolatesare located in the clade B of ITS phylogenetic tree (Lévesque & de Cock 2004), in the P. kashmirense B. Paul, P. afertile Kanouse & T. Humphery, and P. plurisporium group. The isolateswere morphologically close to P. kashmirense and ex-type of P. plurisporium from Abad et al. (1995) study. Formation of loose loops of antheridia filaments around oogonium and coiling around the oogonial stalk separate P. kashmirense (Paul & Bala 2008) from these isolates. Production of strictly filamentous sporangia and globose to irregular hyphal swellings separates P. afertile (Van der Pläats-Niterink 1981) from our isolates. The production of papilla on the oogonial surface has been reported for P. oopapillum Bala & Lèvesque(Bala et al.2010b) and another recently described species, P. longipapillum Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa & Salmaninezhad (Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2019). However, P. oopapillum has only one papilla on each oogonium (Bala et al.2010b), whereas these isolatesproduced two papillae per oogonium. Moreover, P. longipapillum produces strictly filamentous sporangia, indistinguishable from the vegetative hyphae, and rarely up to three antheridia per oogonium, while these isolateshave filamentous slightly inflated sporangia and a greater number of antheridia per oogonium. Another important feature of the isolatesis the production of two adjacent papillae per oogonium, however, P. longipapillum only produces one papilla per oogonium (Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2019).
Group I isolateswere morphologically relatively close to P. plurisporium. Although it has been reported that P. plurisporium produces lobate sporangia with complex structures, all our isolates (i.e. Group I and II) produced only filamentous slightly inflated sporangia. Group II and P. plurisporium main isolates are thoroughly different from each other based on sexual structures, colony morphology, and cardinal temperatures. The absence of more than one oospore per oogonium, fewer antheridia, and specific colony morphology of these isolates, differentiated them from P. plurisporium original description. Besides, most of ourGroup II isolates produced two long papillae on oogonium, which has never been reported in P. plurisporium. Hence, it could be hypothesized that intraspecific variation exists within P. plurisporium at least in the matter of morphology.
The isolates of Group II appeared as a member of P. plurisporium clade in ITS, Btub, and combined gene trees in phylogenetic analyses. It was not true for cox2, where the isolate SS was separated from P. plurisporium (Data not shown), however, other isolates of this group located in the vicinity of P. plurisporium in cox2 tree. This might be due to the existence of different haplotypes in the cytoplasmic genome of SS, which has a maternal inheritance. Our further investigation on isolate SS did not confirm the hybrid origin of this isolate. Generally, phylogenetic studies on multiple genealogies of nuclear (ITS and Btub) sequences, consistently showed that P. plurisporium lineage formed a robust monophyletic group which shared a common ancestor with all the Pythium species within clade B.
Morphological plasticity is a common issue in Pythium species (Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa & Salmaninezhad 2020). Many Pythium species can have multiple variations of a specific morphological feature within a single species (Van der Pläats-Niterink 1981, Zitnick-Anderson 2013). For instance, P. deliense antheridia can be in the monoclinous, diclinous, intercalary, or terminal positions (Van der Pläats-Niterink 1981).Other examples of this phenomenon are P. adhaerens Sparrowwith both terminal and intercalary oogonia, P. anadrum Drechsler with both monoclinous and diclinous antheridia as well as unisporous and multisporous oogonia, P. catenulatum V. D. Matthewswith both terminal and intercalary oogonia as well as monoclinous, diclinous, clavate and crook-necked antheridia, P. hydnosporum (Mont.) J. Schröt. and P. mastophorum Drechsler with both plerotic and aplerotic oospore, P. hypogynum Middleton with both terminal and intercalary sporangia, and P. multisporum with subglobose, globose, oblong and limoniform sporangia as well as both monoclinous and diclinous antheridia (Van der Pläats-Niterink 1981). In most of these examples, the intraspecific variation in morphological features show overlapping ranges, however, in the case of P. plurisporium groups these features hardly overlap. Although rare, the shape of the oogonium can be smooth or ornamented in some Pythium species such as P. heteroogonium Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa & Salmaninezhad, P. irregulare Buisman, and P. carbonicum B. Paul (Middleton 1943, Van der Pläats-Niterink 1981; Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2019). The same phenomenon has been observed in our isolates, forming two morphological groups, in this study.
Several challenges have been reported in the taxonomy of the genus Pythium, such as overlapping of morphological features, difficulties in isolation of certain species, lack of definite morphological structures, pleomorphism, uncertainty in GenBank database, and conflicts between morphological identification and phylogenetic analyses. Considering both morphological and molecular identification methods and their advantages and defects, it is extremely recommended to use both morphological and molecular methods to an accurate identification of Pythium species (Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa & Salmaninezhad 2020). Our results suggested that there might be intraspecific variation within P. plurisporium isolates. However, only 12 isolates from Iran and three isolates from North Carolina have been thoroughly examined for P. plurisporium. Although, there are few world records of P. plurisporium isolates (Abad et al. 1996, Salmaninezhad & Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa 2017), finding and examining a larger number of isolates could better impose the existence of plasticity in P. plurisporium. Moreover, only three loci have been examined in this study. Therefore, conducting a comprehensive phylogeny based on more nuclear and mitochondrial loci could also reveal that whether these isolates belong to the same phylogenetic species or the variation within morphological characters would also appear in molecular taxonomy. Furthermore, the pathogenicity of P. plurisporium has been tested only on rice and bentgrass. Even though, it has been originally described as a second colonizer of bentgrass roots, our results revealed that two distinct morphological groups of P. plurisporium are able to cause different symptoms at different rates. As a consequence, studying the host range of isolates assigned to P. plurisporium and conducting a comparison between their abilities to colonize various hosts would clarify the biological borders of this taxon.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was funded by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF, award number 96008191).