Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
4 Southern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1100 Robert E. Lee Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70124, USA
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
INTRODUCTION
Aflatoxins (AFs) are highly toxic and carcinogenic in animals and humans, leading to hepatotoxicity, teratogenicity, immunotoxicity and even death (Motomura et al. 1999, Wen et al. 2005). Contamination of corn (Zea mays L.), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) and pistachio (Pistachia vera L.) by aflatoxins is a severe economic burden for Iranian growers (Cheraghali et al. 2007, Hedayati et al. 2010, Ghiasian et al. 2011).
Aspergillus section Flavi includes three economically important species: A. flavus, A. parasiticusand A. nomius. Even though these species share numerous common features, they differ in a major attribute, their ability to produce AFs. This widely distributed group of aflatoxigenic species is considered a major problem for animal and human health, since those species are able to grow in almost any kind of crop or food.
After the discovery of a gene cluster as the regulator of AF biosynthesis (Brown et al. 1996), the biosynthetic pathway of AFs has been extensively studied, and most of the enzymes and corresponding involved genes have been identified (Ehrlich et al. 2005, Yabe & Nakajima 2004, Yu et al. 2005, Keller et al. 2005, Wen et al. 2005, Cary & Ehrlich 2006). AF biosynthesis requires at least 25 enzymes and two regulatory proteins encoded by contiguous genes in an 80-kb cluster (Scherm et al. 2005, Yu et al. 2005, Bhatnagar et al. 2006).
The functions of most of the genes required for aflatoxin production have been identified by genetic complementation (Motomura et al. 1999, Chang et al. 2000, Yu et al. 2000).
Generally, the AF biosynthesis genes of A. flavus, A. parasiticus and A. nomius are highly homologous, since the order of the genes within the cluster are the same (Ehrlich et al. 2005, Chang et al. 2007). A significant proportion, but not all of the non-aflatoxigenic A. flavus isolates have been found to contain various deletions in the AF gene cluster (Ehrlich & Cotty 2004, Chang et al. 2005, 2006) which are also common in some strains of A. oryzae (Chang et al. 2005, 2006). The loss of the ability to produce AFGs in A. flavus seems to result from a deletion in the terminal region of the cluster corresponding to genes aflF (= norB) and aflU (= cypA) (Ehrlich et al. 2004).
Molecular techniques have been widely applied to distinguish the aflatoxin producing and non-producing strains of A. flavus and related species, through the correlation of presence/absence of one or several genes involved in the AF biosynthetic pathway and the ability/inability to produce AFs. Recently, DNA–based detection systems have been introduced as powerful tools for detecting and identifying the aflatoxin producing fungi (Geisen 1996). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the method of choice for this purpose (Shapira et al. 1996).
Färber et al. (1997) detected the aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus in contaminated figs by performing a monomeric PCR with three sets of primers specific for three structural genes of the AF biosynthetic pathway, aflD, aflM and aflO. Other attempts to develop PCR-based methods for detection of aflatoxigenic fungi (A. flavus and A. parasiticus) were underway (Chen et al. 2002, Mayer et al. 2003, Scherm et al. 2005, Baird et al. 2006, Lee et al. 2006, Rahimi et al. 2008). PCR-based methods utilize primers for aflatoxin genes not necessarily unique to aflatoxigenic fungi. These methods have not been tested for reproducibility on a number of different contaminated commodities (Bhatnagar et al. 2006).
Reports on deletion patterns of non-aflatoxigenic A. flavus strains are different. For instance, the loss of aflatoxin production in strain A. flavus 649-1 is associated with large deletions in the aflatoxin gene cluster (Prieto et al. 1996). Non-aflatoxigenic A. flavus AF36, widely used in the management of aflatoxin contamination of cotton in Arizona, has a defect in the gene pksA (Ehrlich & Cotty 2004). Rodrigues et al. (2009) reported that gene expression of aflD in Aspergillus section Flavi was a good indicator to distinguish between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of A. flavus. Okoth et al. (2012) tested A. flavus and A. parasiticus isolates for the presence of aflD and aflQ genes.
Strains of A. flavus show a great variation in their ability to produce aflatoxins. There are a number of Aspergillus species that produce aflatoxin but are not classified as section Flavi (Cary & Ehrlich 2006). Greatest successes to date in biological control of aflatoxin contamination in both pre- and post-harvest crops have been achieved through application of biocompetitive non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus and/or A. parasiticus (Yin et al. 2008).
In the current study, we identified genomic deletions of non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus based on polymerase chain reaction with the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fungal strains
Fifteen non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus from a collection of 52 strains from peanut (IRG075, IRG129 and IRG517), corn (IRM074, IRM193, IRM014, IRM211, IRM031, IRM041 and IRM081) and pistachio (IRP049, IRP107, IRP082, IRP144), representing a wide range of geographic regions of Iran and different vegetative compatibility groups (IR1 to IR15; unpublished data) were used for this study (Tables 1 & 2). Morphological characterization of non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus was based on seriation on Czapek Yeast Agar (CYA)25. The observed characteristics on this medium were as follows: conidia ornamentation, conidia size (μm), colony color and sclerotia. The colony diameter (cm) was measured on CZ42. Conidia of A. flavus species have relatively thin and finely to relatively rough walls. Their shapes vary from spherical to elliptical, and when grown on Czapek-Dox (CZ), colonies of A. flavus are yellowish-green (Klich, 2002, Samson et al. 2004, 2006, Pildain et al. 2008) (Table 1).
Table 1. List of non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus.
Strain |
Sclerotia on CYA25a |
Seriation on CYA25b |
Conidia on CYA25 |
Diameter on CZ42c |
Colony color on CYA25 |
AFBs on YES |
IRP-049 |
> 400 |
b/u |
Smooth |
1.8 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRP-107 |
> 400 |
B |
Smooth |
1.7 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRP-082 |
- |
B |
Smooth |
2.5 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRP-144 |
> 400 |
B |
Smooth |
2 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRG-075 |
> 400 |
b/u |
Smooth |
1.5 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRG-129 |
- |
B |
Smooth |
2.9 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRM-074 |
> 400 |
b/u |
Smooth |
3 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRM-193 |
- |
B |
Smooth |
2 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRM-014 |
> 400 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
2.8. |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRM-211 |
> 400 |
u/b |
Smooth |
2.6 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRP-179 |
> 400 |
B |
Smooth |
2.7 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRG-517 |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
1.8 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRM-031 |
> 400 |
B |
slightly rough |
2.3 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRM-041 |
> 400 |
B |
smooth |
2.9 |
yellowish-green |
- |
IRM-081 |
- |
B |
smooth |
2.7 |
yellowish-green |
- |
-: not detected n.d.: not determined a: size, in μm: average of 15 sclerotia b: u = uniseriate; b = biseriate; u/b = predominantly uniseriate; b/u = predominantly biseriate c: average of 3 colonies, in cm.
Table 2. Non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus used in this study.
Strain isolate |
VCGs |
Geographical origin |
Source |
Sclerotium production |
IRP-049 |
IR1 |
Rafsanjan |
pistachio soil |
+/L |
IRP-107 |
IR2 |
Rafsanjan |
pistachio soil |
+/L |
IRP-082 |
IR3 |
Damghan |
pistachio soil |
- |
IRP-144 |
IR4 |
Damghan |
pistachio soil |
+/L |
IRG-075 |
IR5 |
Minoodasht |
Peanut soil |
+/L |
IRG-129 |
IR6 |
Astaneh-e Ashrafieh |
Peanut soil |
- |
IRM-074 |
IR7 |
Darab |
Maize soil |
+/L |
IRM-193 |
IR8 |
Fasa |
Maize soil |
- |
IRM-014 |
IR9 |
Parsabad |
Maize soil |
+/L |
IRM-211 |
IR10 |
Parsabad |
Maize soil |
+/L |
IRP-179 |
IR11 |
Rafsanjan |
pistachio kernel |
+/L |
IRG-517 |
IR12 |
Astaneh-e Ashrafieh |
Peanut kernel |
- |
IRM-031 |
IR13 |
Parsabad |
Maize soil |
+/L |
IRM-041 |
IR14 |
Darab |
Maize kernel |
+/L |
IRM-081 |
IR15 |
Darab |
Maize kernel |
- |
+: Sclerotia producer -: Sclerotia non-producer L: Sclerotia >400 µm on CYA25
Aflatoxin analysis
All of the isolates were initially screened for aflatoxigenic ability on yeast extract sucrose agar medium (YES: Yeast Extract 20 g/L, Saccharose 150 g/L, Agar 15 g/L) amended with 0.3% (w/v) methylated β-cyclodextrin (mß-CD) (Fente et al. 2001). All of the non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus were re-tested for confirmation of AFs production in AF-inducing YES. Strains were inoculated on Petri dishes containing YES and incubated at 25-27 °C for 7 days in the dark. A Method based on HPLC with fluorescence detection has been suggested to measure aflatoxins B in A. flavus isolates (Bragulat et al. 2001). Briefly, extraction of aflatoxin using MeOH/H2O (80:20, v/v) and purification by an immunoaffinity column cleanup were carried out. HPLC system was equipped with an autosampler; a pump (Sykam 2100) and a reverse phase C18 column (Genesis ODS2, 250×4.6 mm, 5 μm), fitted with a precolumn with the same stationary phase and a fluorescence detector (RF-10AXL).
The injection volume was 100 µL. The fluorescence detection was carried out at excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 nm and 435 nm, respectively (detection limit = 0.5 ng/g). A standard solution of AFB1 and AFB2 (Sigma Co.) was used. HPLC grade solvents (methanol and acetonitrile) were used to prepare the AF standards in the sample extraction, and also to prepare the mobile phase. The A. flavus aflatoxin producing strain SRKC-G1907 which released only aflatoxins of group B was used as the reference strain.
Isolation of genomic DNA
Total DNA was extracted from mycelia of fungal isolates obtained from 7-day-old cultures grown in YES liquid media according to Prabha et al. (2013) with minor modifications.
The DNA concentration was measured with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop ND-1000, Wilmington, Delaware USA).
Molecular detection of A. flavus isolates
All the non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus were detected based on sequence analysis of ITS2 rDNA by using specific primer pair FVAVIQ1:5'-GTC-GTC-CCC-TCT-CCG-G-3´ and FLAQ2: 5´-CTG-GAA-AAA-GAT-TGA-TTT-GCG-3', as described by Sardiñas et al. (2011). The primer pairs were based on three multicopy ITS2 rDNA target sequences. The primers FLAVIQ1/FLAQ2 yielded an amplicon of 100 bp in A. flavus.
Analysis of aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster PCR primers
To design oligonucleotide primers, known sequences for aflT, pksA, afIR, aflJ, ver-1, omtA, omtB, aflD, ordA, verA, norA, hypA,norB-cypA intergenic region (norB and cypA genes), glcA(sugar utilization gene) and C3 (flanking region gene, 5'end) were derived from the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway genes of A. flavus AF36 (AY 510455), AF70 (AY 510453), AF13 (AY510451), BN008 (AY 510451.1) and A. parasiticus AY371490 were obtained from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Primer pairs designed using OLIGO (version 5.0; National Biosciences) are depicted in Table 3. Some primer sets were based on Chang et al. (2005) and Ehrlich et al. (2005). The housekeeping gene tub1 coding for ß-tubulin (primer pair tub1-F/tub1-R) was chosen as a system control for PCR (internal amplification control). The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels, which were stained with DNA green viewer dye (green fluorescent stain, 10 mg/ml).
PCR analysis
The fifteen non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus were tested for presence of 14 genes and one intergenic region of aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster by PCR amplification in a 25 µl reaction mixture in a Biometra Thermal Cycler (T1 thermocycler; Biometra, Göttingen, Germany).
Table 3. Primers used in this study, target gene, sequence and expected PCR product size.
Primers |
Gene(s) |
Primer sequence (5' 3') |
PCR product Size (bp) |
Reference |
aflT-F |
aflT |
Tgcggacatctaacgaccat |
750 |
Chang et al.(2005) |
aflT-R |
|
Aggtcacttcgttcgtgaagg |
|
|
pksA-II-F |
pksA |
Cagttgctcccaaggagtggt |
518 |
This study |
pksA-II-R |
|
Gctgggrttctgcatgggtt |
|
|
aflR-II-F |
aflR |
Aaccgcatccacaatctcat |
794 |
This study |
aflR-II-R |
|
Gcagttcrctcagaacragctg |
|
|
aflJ-II-F |
aflJ |
Cttcaacaacgaccmaaggtt |
788 |
This study |
aflJ-II-R |
|
Tcggttgtcatcgttatcca |
|
|
aflM-II-F |
ver-1 |
agccaaagtcgtggtkaact |
786 |
This study |
aflM-II-R |
|
Ccatccaccmcaatgatct |
|
|
aflP-II-F |
omtA |
ctcctcwaccagyggcttcg |
593 |
This study |
aflP-II-R |
|
caggatatcattgtggaygg |
|
|
aflO-III-F |
omtB |
acttggcattcygaataggc |
643 |
This study |
aflO-III-R |
|
aacccasaataggtcgcatc |
|
|
aflD-II-F |
nor1 |
accgctacgccggcrctctcggcac |
400 |
This study |
aflD-II-R |
|
gttggccgccagcttcgacactccg |
|
|
aflQ-II-F |
ordA |
ttaaggcagcggaatacaag |
719 |
This study |
aflQ-II-R |
|
gacgsccaaagccraacacaaa |
|
|
aflN-II-F |
verA |
ccgcaacaccacmaagtagca |
424 |
This study |
aflN-II-R |
|
aaacgctctccaggcmcctt |
|
|
aflE-F |
norA |
gtgttcgtgtgtcgccctta |
770 |
Chang et al. (2005) |
aflE-R |
|
gtcggtgcttctcatcctga |
|
|
aflY-F |
hypA |
gcatgtccgtcgtcctgata |
654 |
Ehrlich et al. (2005). |
aflY-R |
|
cccattgatcaatctcggat |
|
|
C3-F |
C3 |
tctggagtcggaggttaggtt |
544 |
Chang et al. (2005) |
C3-R |
|
gagcaacacgatcattgcat |
|
|
glcA-F |
glcA |
aagacacagtcatcgcctgtt |
745 |
Chang et al.(2005) |
glcA-R |
|
acgcctttatcgagccaata |
|
|
norB-cypA-F |
norB, cypA |
gtgcccagcatcttggtcca |
300,800,1800 |
Ehrlich et al.( 2004) |
norB-cypA-F |
|
aggacttgatgattcctcgtc |
|
|
Tub1-F |
tub1 |
gtccggtgctggtaacaact |
902 |
Chang et al.(2005) |
Tub1-R |
|
ggaggtggagtttccaatga |
|
|
DNA amplification conditions
Fourteen aflatoxin clustered genes and the intergenic region norb-cypA were amplified using the primers at a concentration of 10 pmol/μl, 50 ng template DNA, 50 μmol of each of the four dNTPs and 5 units of Taq polymerase (BioNeer Inc., Korea) in a total volume of 25 μl containing 10× assay buffer (1× contains 10 mmol/l Tris-HCl, pH 8.8 at 25°C, 50 mmol/l KCl, 1.5 mmol/l MgCl2). PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 2 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 60 sec, primer-specific annealing temperature at 45°C for 60 sec, extension at 72°C for 90 sec and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The reaction was carried out in the Biometra Thermal Cycler.
Gel electrophoresis
The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5X TBE buffer. The amplified products were visualized under UV transilluminator (UVsolo TS gel documentation system, Biometra Co.) and compared with a standard DNA size marker (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Fermentas, Germany).
RESULTS
Aflatoxin analysis
In our study, absence of fluorescence on mß-CD was correlated with no AFs production (determined by HPLC). This medium did not yield any false-negatives. In the other words, all the A. flavus strains had already been characterized for their aflatoxigenic ability, after mycelium collection YES broth were analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC to confirm the AF production. Since AF production is extremely dependent on growth conditions, it was important to determine aflatoxigenic ability under the current test conditions.
Molecular detection of A. flavus isolates
All the fifteen non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus had the species specific gene, and were therefore confirmed as A. flavus (Fig 1).
Deletions in the aflatoxin gene cluster
Oligonucleotide primer sets (Table 3) targeted PCR products of 0.3–1.8 kb (300-1800 bp). In the present study, additional set of primers specific for the aflR, pksA, aflJ, ver1, omtA, omtB and aflD genes were also used. The PCR results are summarized in Table 4. On the basis of PCR assay, we grouped the fifteen non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus into deletion patterns. The genomic deletions were identified in all the fifteen A. flavus strains examined, resulting in loss of parts of genes from the aflatoxin gene cluster (Table 2). Based on the banding patterns, twelve deletion patterns (I-XII), designated as A to L were detected among the non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus. The deletion patterns of examined non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus are shown in Table 5. The non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus were placed into five groups based on their number of amplified genes (Table 6). Two strains IRP049 and IRP082 from pistachio have identical deletion patterns (C and I, respectively, Table 6). Deletion patterns were mainly in the left side of aflatoxin gene cluster (hypA, about 10-15 kb) and regulatory genes aflR and aflJ (approximately 35 kb).
Three independent deletions as type I, type II and type III were found in the norB-cypA region (Table 4). Only in A. flavus strain IRG75 from peanut the norB and cypA (norB-cypA intergenic region, deletion pattern type III) were not amplified. In addition, in twelve strains of A. flavus from pistachio and maize and two peanut strains (IRG129, IRG517), the fragments 0.8 and 0.3 kbp were amplified by primer pair norB-cypA-F/norB–cypA-R. Individual VCGs contain isolates from different deletion patterns (Table 6).
DISCUSSION
In this study, 15 of the 52 non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus collected from soil and kernel of peanut, maize and pistachio belonging to various geographical regions and distinct VCGs were analyzed for aflatoxin gene cluster deletion patterns. The 15 non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus were selected in this study, because they had proved to produce polymorphic DNA fragments based on microsatellite primed-PCR (MP-PCR) marker and different VCGs in previous studies (Houshyarfard et al. 2014).
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 M C+
Fig.1. Specific amplification of internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) of extracted genomic DNA electrophoresed in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel from fifteen aflatoxin non-producing strains of Aspergillus flavus. C+ = positive control, M = Molecular marker (50 bp DNA Ladder, Fermentas).
Table 4. Prevalence of aflatoxin-associated genes among fifteen Iranian non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genes** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strain |
Source* |
aflT |
pksA |
aflR |
aflJ |
ver1 |
omtA |
omtB |
aflD |
ordA |
verA |
norA |
hypA |
C3 |
glcA |
norB-cypA |
IRP-049 |
S/P |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRP-107 |
S/P |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRP-082 |
S/P |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRP-144 |
S/P |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRG-075 |
S/G |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
III |
IRG-129 |
S/G |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
I |
IRM-074 |
S/M |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRM-193 |
S/M |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRM-014 |
S/M |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRM-211 |
S/M |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRP-179 |
K/P |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRG-517 |
K/G |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
I |
IRM-031 |
S/M |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
II |
IRM-041 |
K/M |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
IRM-081 |
K/M |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
II |
SRKC-G1907 |
Control |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
*: S : Soil K: Kernel P: Pistachio G: Peanut M: Maize +: present -: absent Isolate name in bold indicates the aflatoxin producer.
Table 5. Deletion patterns (A-L) in the aflatoxin gene cluster of non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus.
Deletion pattern
|
C3 |
norB-cypA |
aflT |
pksA |
aflD (nor1) |
aflR |
aflJ (afls) |
aflE (norA) |
aflM (ver-1) |
aflN (verA) |
aflO (omtB) |
aflP (omtA) |
aflQ (ordA) |
aflY (hypA) |
glcA |
A |
○ |
I |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
B |
● |
I |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
C |
● |
II |
● |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
D |
● |
II |
○ |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
E |
● |
II |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
F |
● |
II |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
G |
● |
II |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
H |
● |
II |
● |
○ |
● |
○ |
● |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
I |
● |
II |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
○ |
● |
● |
○ |
○ |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
J |
○ |
II |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
○ |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
K |
● |
II |
○ |
● |
● |
○ |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
L |
● |
III |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
○ |
● |
Filled and empty circles indicate positive and negative PCR products in Iranian strains, respectively. Original gene names are above and new names are below (Yu et al. 2004). Types I, II and III deletions in the norB-cypA region indicate 0.3 kb, 0.8 kb and no product, respectively. C3 and glcA genes are in the flanking and sugar utilization regions of the aflatoxin gene cluster.
Table 6. Grouping of aflatoxin non-producing strains of A. flavus based on the number of amplified genes and one intergenic region.
Group |
No. of amplicons |
Strains |
Deletion pattern |
1 |
14 |
IRP049 |
C |
2 |
13 |
IRP107, IRM193, IRM074, IRM014, IRG517 |
A,D,E |
3 |
12 |
IRM041,IRM081,IRM211,IRG129,IRG075 |
B,F,G,L |
4 |
11 |
IRP179,IRP144 |
H,K |
5 |
10 |
IRM031, IRP082 |
I,J |
It is to be emphasized that the PCR detection of A. flavus is no guarantee of aflatoxin production, since genes other than those involved in the biosynthesis of aflatoxins are not targeted for amplification. Bearing in mind that our molecular studies were applied to a limited number of non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus and that it was not our goal to study barcoding sequences, our results strengthen the hypothesis that the ITS region is suitable for the identification of A. flavus isolates.
Analysis of deletions within the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster for the fifteen Iranian non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus revealed that A. flavus strains had different deletions in the aflatoxin gene cluster. The detection of mycotoxigenic fungi has relied, for the most part, on the time consuming isolation and culturing techniques that require taxonomical expertise (Bhatnagar et al. 2006). The non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus lacked 3-5 different genes (the aflatoxigenic strain of A. flavus used as a positive control had all of the genes). The deletion patterns observed in this study have not been previously reported. Some researchers reported that the analysis of deletion patterns in aflatoxin gene cluster was a useful marker for the identification of non-aflatoxigenic strains (Kusumoto et al. 2000, Ehrlich et al. 2005).
The variable amplicons of genes from aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster were produced by the non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus from pistachio (10, 11, 13 & 14), maize (10, 12 & 13) and peanut (12 & 13), soil and kernels. The pksA, aflT and omtB amplicons were not detected in pistachio non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus. The only product amplified in the fifteen strains of A. flavus was C3 which belonged to pistachio strains. The C3 is the sugar utilization genes in the flanking region of the aflatoxin gene cluster. Donner et al. (2010) suggested that remnants of the aflatoxin gene cluster are not necessary for the isolates to exclude aflatoxin producers during the host infection, effectively. The genes ver-1, nor-1, ordA, omtA and glcA were present in all of the non-aflatoxigenic strains. The glcA is a gene in the sugar utilization cluster adjacent to the 3´end of the aflatoxin cluster.
Scherm et al. (2005) studied 13 strains of A. parasiticus and/or A. flavus and found consistency of aflD, aflO and aflP genes in detecting AF production ability, further indicating them as potential markers. The aflD gene encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of the first stable aflatoxin biosynthesis intermediate, norsolorinic acid to averantin in A. flavus (Papa 1982), while the aflQ gene is involved in the conversion of O-methylsterigmatocystin (omst) to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and aflatoxin G1 (AFG2), and also dihydro-O-methylsterigmatocystin (dmdhst) to aflatoxin B2 (AFB2) and aflatoxin G2 (AFG2) in A. parasiticus (Cleavland 1989) and A. flavus (Yu et al. 1998). It was assumed that the lack of amplicons revealed an evidence of the genetic variability for non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus. It should be noted that aflatoxin biosynthesis pathway is highly complex, and just the key genes directly related to aflatoxin biosynthesis are useful for analyses of aflatoxin gene cluster. Therefore, the genes encoding the key enzymes necessary for aflatoxin production are used in this study.
It was assumed that non-aflatoxigenicity of our A. flavus strains might be associated with no DNA amplification. In the other words, the lack of aflatoxin production in the strains of A. flavus may be due to the lack of genes in their genome. Deletion of portions of the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster within atoxigenic A. flavus strain is not rare (Chang et al. 2005). The loss of aflatoxin production by Iranian non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus is not well understood. It should be considered that the lack of AFB production in non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus does not clearly specify that their inability is only due to the partial loss of aflatoxin gene cluster (small deletions). Our findings should be demonstrated by other molecular methods as well as positive-negative PCR. For example, although A. oryzae strains have the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster, it is not functional (Tominaga et al. 2006). Several reports have demonstrated that the risk of loss of gene, DNA recombinations, DNA inversions, partial deletions, translocations and other genomic disorders in the aflatoxin gene cluster are associated with proximity to the telomere region of fungal chromosome (Carbone et al. 2007). The aflatoxin biosynthesis genes in A. oryzae contain deletions, frame-shift mutations and base pair substitutions that explain the lack of aflatoxin production (Tominaga et al. 2006). Until recently, there have been very few verifiable reports of deletion patterns from aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster in the Iranian non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus. Chang et al. (2005) reported eight deletion patterns (A to H) in the aflatoxin genes of 38 non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus. They supported the hypothesis that deal with the relationship between the inability to produce aflatoxin and a partial or entire gene deletion or mutations in the aflatoxin gene cluster of non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus. Criseo et al. (2001) reported that 85 of 134 non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus had numerous deletions in aflatoxin gene cluster. Yin et al. (2009) showed that 24 of 35 isolates containing no detectable aflatoxins had the entire aflatoxin gene cluster. Eleven non-aflatoxigenic isolates had five different deletion patterns in the cluster. Mauro et al. (2013) detected six deletion patterns in the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster of Italian non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus. No deletions in the cluster were detected for twelve non-aflatoxigenic isolates and ten had the entire cluster deleted.
The presence of two strategic genes of the AF biosynthetic pathway, aflR and aflJ was associated with the aflatoxigenic ability of our isolates. Our findings revealed that aflatoxin biosynthesis regulatory genes (aflR and aflJ) and the structural gene hypA are more important genes to detect and identify Iranian non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus.
The aflR and aflJ genes play an important role in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway by regulating the activity of other structural genes such as omt-A, ver-1 and nor-1 (Bennett & Klich 2003, Yu et al. 2005).
The aflJ gene which is adjacent to aflR is necessary for expression of other genes in the aflatoxin cluster (Chang 2003). However, these findings are not according to some reports. These reports indicated that aflR gene could not distinguish and differentiate between aflatoxigenic and non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus (Rodrigues et al. 2009). Gallo et al. (2012) studied the two regulatory genes (aflR and aflJ) and five structural genes (aflD, aflM, aflO, aflP and aflQ) of non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus from maize, and reported four different groups (I-IV) based on the gene amplification patterns. Erami et al. (2007) differentiated the aflatoxigenic strains among fourteen A. flavus strains using three structural genes ver-1, nor-1, omt-1 and one aflatoxin biosynthesis regulatory gene (aflR). Other reports suggest that DNA banding patterns of non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus are variable based on lack of the genes aflP, aflM, aflD and aflR (Criseo et al. 2008). Kale et al. (2007) showed that the regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis in some strains of A. parasiticus was not due to lack of defects in three aflatoxin regulatory genes aflR, aflJ and laeA. It is likely that secondary metabolic pathways in these types of A. parasiticus strains were not associated with aflR and aflJ genes and were independent of other aflatoxin positive regulators. So far, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the lack of aflatoxin production in some strains of A. flavus have not been known (Schmidt-Heydt et al. 2009).
In addition, the norB and cypA (norB-cypA intergenic region) amplicons were not detected in peanut strains of A. flavus. Yin et al. (2009) showed that fragments 0.3 and 0.8 kbp were amplified in fifteen A. flavus strains by the primer pair norB-cypA-F/norB–cypA-R.
Products from verA and norA were amplified from peanut strains of A. flavus. The hypA amplicon was detected in almost all the non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus (except for pistachio strains IRP049 and IRP107).The hypA is a gene adjacent to sugar utilization genes in the flanking regions and adjacent to the 3´end of the aflatoxin gene cluster. Ehrlich et al. (2005) showed that the sugar utilization gene cluster on the right side of the aflatoxin gene cluster is well-conserved.
In the current study, some isolates belonging to different VCGs had identical deletion patterns and were closely related. Most of the non-aflatoxigenic strains of the examined VCGs of A. flavus produced amplicons for each of the aflatoxin biosynthesis genes examined. In nature, VCGs largely behave as clonal lineages (Ehrlich et al. 2007).
As a result of this study, the basis is provided for initial selection of endemic non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus for biological control of aflatoxin contamination in Iran.
CONCLUSION
An attempt has been made in this study to highlight that PCR-based methods have provided a rapid and effective method for identification of genes potentially involved in aflatoxin formation and detection of non-aflatoxigenic fungus A. flavus for researchers. But, AF biosynthesis is based on a highly complex pathway. It is thus not surprising that genetic protocols that able to fully differentiate between AF producers and non-producers have not yet been successfully established.
The use of conventional PCR, utilizing primers targeting the aflR, aflJ and hypA genes appears to offer some promise in detecting Iranian non-aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus, particularly with respect to the ability to distinguish characteristic DNA banding patterns derived from amplicons of appropriate size.
Since the A. flavus strains used in this study were all non-aflatoxigenic, we consider that more strains of the species A. flavus, which is extremely variable in terms of AF production need to be tested in order to guarantee the ability of aflR, aflJ and hypA to be used as a molecular marker for this characteristic. Considering the potential role that the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster has in the aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus, studying the genes in aflatoxin non-producing strains of A. flavus collected from different regions and substrates (soil and kernel) may provide insights into the significance of these genes for the aflatoxigenicity of the A. flavus isolates.
The present work is far from being a finished business, and a lot of windows have been left open.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Authors feel pleasure in expressing their grateful thanks to anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that helped us improve this manuscript. This study was funded by the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.