A preliminary study on the genus Fusicladium s. l. in Iran

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

2 Department of Botany, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP), Tehran, Iran

3 Clinic of Plant Protection, Astaneh Ashrafieh, Guilan, Iran

Abstract

During 2011, twigs, leaves and fruits of symptomatic hosts containing Fusicladium species from Guilan, Mazandaran, Qazvin and Ardabil provinces were sampled and examined. Five species including F. carpophilum, F. fraxini, F. oleagineum, F. pomi and F. pyrorum were identified based on morphological data. Of these, F. carpophilum and F. fraxini are identified as new records for the mycobiota of Iran. Fraxinus sp., Prunus persica var. nectarina, Pyracantha sp., red apple cultivar of Malus pumila and Khoj (local variety of Pyrus communis in Guilan province) are identified as new hosts for the 

genus Fusicladium in Iran. Cultures of F. fraxini, F. pomi and F. pyrorum are deposited at fungal culture collection of Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection. A brief description and illustration and a key to Fusicladium species reported from Iran are provided. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


INTRODUCTION

 

FusicladiumBonord. was established to accommodate Venturia  Sacc. (Ascomycota, Pleosporales, Venturiaceae E. Müll. & Arx ex M. E. Barr) anamorphs with sympodial (denticulate) or percurrent (annellate) conidiogenous cells. Three genera were later distinguished based on the proliferation mode: Fusicladium with sympodial proliferation, Pollaccia E. Bald. & Cif. with monoblastic, determinate to percurrent conidiogenous cells (with few rather inconspicuous annellations) and Spilocaea Fr. with percurrent proliferation and numerous, conspicuous annellations. Braun et al. (2002) suggested that the separation of these anamorphic genera is not tenable since the conidiogenesis and structure of the conidiogenous loci are uniform. Molecular examinations clearly showed that Venturia is a monophyletic clade that can not be separated into sub-clades relevant to these anamorphic genera (Beck et al. 2005). Therefore, it is proposed that these genera to be merged in one anamorphic genus. Hence, the name Fusicladium was conserved against other names (Braun 2005). In this new concept, Fusicladium s. l. includes Fusicladium, Spilocaea, Pollaccia, Cycloconium and Pseudocladosporium (Braun et al. 2002, Braun 2005, Crous et al. 2007). They are phytopathologically relevant pathogens, causing leaf spot, necrosis, scab diseases as well as leaf and fruit deformations of at least 52 angiospermous plant genera. These fungi are host specific, mostly confined to a single host genus or allied host genera in a single family, e.g. Fusicladium pomi attacks members of Rosaceae (Schubert et al. 2003). A world monograph of the genus Fusicladium s. l. Bonord. em. Schubert, Ritschel et U. Braun was published in 2003 and 57 taxa belonging to the anamorphic genus were described (Schubert et al. 2003). Some genera such as Cladosporium are taxonomically related to Fusicladium. The structure of the conidiogenous loci and conidial hila proved to be the basic feature for a natural classification (David 1997), which could be confirmed by molecular examinations (Braun et al. 2003). True species of Cladosporium are characterized by having pigmented conidiophores with coronate conidiogenous loci, i.e. composed of a central convex dome surrounded by a raised periclinal rim, and pigmented conidia formed in acropetal chains (David 1997, Braun et al. 2003). Therefore, in a series of taxonomic studies of the genus Cladosporium s.l. several new species and new combinations are proposed in the genus Fusicladium (Schubert 2005, Schubert & Braun 2005a, b, Schubert & Braun 2007, Braun et. al. 2008, Crous et al. 2007, 2010a, b). Although several species of the genus Fusicladium including F. pomi, F. pyrorum, F. oleagineum,
F. eriobotryae, F. heterosporum, F. crataegi
,
F. dendritichum (= F. pomi), F. virescens
(= F. pyrorum) and F. cerasiare so far reported from Iran (Hedjaroude & Abbasi 2000, Mahdian 2006, Ershad 2009, Askari & Ghaderi 2010, Sanei & Razavi 2011), but most of them are not adequately described based on Iranian materials. This paper presents a primary finding on the genus Fusicladium species and their hosts in Iran.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Plant parts (twigs, leaves, fruits) showing Fusicladium spp. symptoms were collected from Guilan, Mazandaran, Qazvin and Ardabil provinces of Iran. Moreover, all Fusicladium specimens preserved at fungal collection of the University of Guilan were reexamined. VANOX AHBS3 Olympus light microscope was used to examine fungal structures, and a BH2 Olympus light microscope equipped with a SONY DSCHX1 digital camera was used for photography. Structures were mounted in lactic acid, and 30 and 10 measurements (× 1000 magnification) determined for conidia and conidiophores respectively, with the extremes of spore measurements given in parentheses. The identification of fungal species was determined according to Schubert et al. (2003). Host plants were identified according to Mozaffarian (1998). All collected specimens were deposited in the fungal collection of the Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Iran.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

In our study, five species including F. carpophilum, F. fraxini, F. pomi, F. pyrorum and F. oleagineum were identified from newly collected plant materials in four provinces of Iran (Guilan, Qazvin, Ardabil and Mazandaran). F. carpophilum and F. fraxini are reported for the first time from Iran. Two species; F. cerasi and F. crataegi, which have already been reported from Iran (Schubert et al. 2003, Khabiri 1952, Esfandiari 1948a, Scharif & Ershad 1966) were not found in this study. A brief description of identified taxa and a key to Fusicladium species reported from Iran are presented.

 

Fusicladium carpophilum (Thüm.) Oudem., Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk.: 388 (1900) Fig. 1A, 2A

 

On fruits and twigs, patches on the fruits superficial, circular to oval, small, greenish brown, conidiophores solitary, erect, somewhat flexuous or straight, unbranched, 29–105 × 4–6.2 μm, septate, medium brown, smooth, sometimes swollen at the base, walls somewhat thickened. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal, 19–26 μm long, with 3–7 denticulate loci, 1–2 μm wide, unthickened, not darkened. Conidia catenate, cylindrical to fusiform, straight, 12.5–20(–22) × 4–5 μm, aseptate, pale olivaceous, smooth, hila truncate, 1–1.5(–2) μm wide, unthickened, somewhat darkened.

Specimens examined: IRAN, Tajan Gokeh village, Astaneh Ashrafieh, Guilan Province, on fruits of Prunus persica var. nectarine, 12 Jun. 2012, M. Mousakhah, (1029).

 

 

 

Fig. 1. Scab disease symptoms caused by Fusicladium s. l. species on leaves and fruits of few hosts in natural condition on: (A) Prunus persica var. nectarine, (B) Fraxinus sp., (C) and (D) Malus pumila, (E) Pyracantha coccinea, (F) Eriobotrya japonica, (G) Pyrus communis, (H) Khoj (local variety of Pyrus communis in Guilan Province, Iran), and (I) Olea europaea.

 

 

Fig. 2. Conidia and conidiophores of Fusicladium carpophilum (A) and F. fraxini (B). Scale bars = 10 μm.

 

 

Notes: According to Schubert et al. (2003) four species, F. pomi, F. obducens, F. cerasi and
F. carpophilum, have been reported on Prunus species. In F. obducens and F. cerasi the conidia often are not catenate. The latter three species have sympodial conidiogenesis. F. carpophilum differs from F. cerasi, a previously reported species from Iran, by having catenate conidia, longer conidiophores (25–100 μm) than those of F. cerasi [(10–)20–40(–60) μm] and its broad host range (rarely occurring on Prunus cerasus) compared with F. cerasi with narrow host range, mostly occurring on Prunus cerasus. Fusicladium carpophilum is a new record for the mycobiota of Iran.

 

Fusicladium fraxini Aderh.,Nova Hedwigia 36: 74, 83 (1897) Fig. 1B, 2B

 

Leaf spots amphigenous, circular to irregular, about 5 mm wide, olivaceous-brown on the upper leaf surface, conidiophores mostly erect, straight to geniculate, flexuous, often unbranched, sometimes branched, (18–)26–45(–50) ´ 4–7 μm, 0(–1) septate, pale olivaceous to medium brown, smooth, often conspicuously lobed at the base. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal or conidiophores usually reduced to conidiogenous cells, proliferation sympodial with 5–10(–14) loci, loci sub-denticulate, 1(–2) μm wide, minutely thickened. Conidia solitary, fusiform to obclavate, straight, (12–)14–17(–18) ´ (4–)5–6 μm, 1(–2)-septate, not or only slightly constricted at the septa, septa somewhat in the lower half, hila 1(–2) μm wide, unthickened.

Specimens examined: IRAN, College of Agricultural Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, on leaves of Fraxinus sp., 6 Jul. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1026), and IRAN, Ghalehroodkhan, Fuman, Guilan Province, on leaves of Fraxinus sp., 4 Aug. 2005, S. A. Khodaparast, (1025).

Notes: So far two species have been described on Fraxinus; Fusicladium fraxini and F. nebulosum that can be separated in conidiophore size, proliferation, colour, etc. (Schubert et al. 2003). F. fraxini is a new record for mycobiota of Iran. Conidiophores of Iranian isolates of F. fraxini are conspicuously lobed at the base. This character was not mentioned in Schubert et al. (2003). Further studies on these isolates are in progress to evaluate this character value in terms of taxonomy.

 

Fusicladium pomi (Fr.) Lind, Danish fungi: 521 (1913) Fig. 1C-F, 3A-C

 

On living leaves and fruits, spots amphigenous, sub-circular to irregular, up to 10 mm wide, pale olivaceous-brown, becoming greyish black, on leaves sometimes surrounded by a yellowish halo, often around the main midrib, occasionally covering large leaf segments. On fruits forming small, circular to irregular spots, sub-cuticular, margin indefinite, olivaceous-brown. Conidiophores mostly in loose to dense fascicles, erumpent through the cuticle, erect, straight to slightly flexuous, cylindrical to ampulliform, unbranched, 14–22 ´ 7–10 μm, aseptate (on yellow apple), 19–31 × 7 μm, aseptate (on red apple), 10–25 ´ 5–7 μm, aseptate (on Eriobotrya japonica) and (14–)24–58 ´ 5–6 μm, (0–)1 septate (on Pyracantha sp.), walls thickened, often swollen at the base. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal, with a single locus, proliferation percurrent, with conspicuous annellations, loci truncate, 4–5μm wide, unthickened, not darkened. Conidia solitary, shape variable, ovoid to obpyriform or obclavate, straight, (12–)16–25 (–26) × 7–9 μm, 0(–1) septate (on yellow apple), (13–)17–24 (–26) × 7 μm, 0(–1) septate (on red apple), (11–)13–18´ 7–9 μm, aseptate (on Eriobotrya japonica) and 12–18 ´ 7–10 μm, 0(–1) septate (on Pyracantha sp.), walls somewhat thickened, narrowly pointed or broadly rounded at the apex, truncate at the base. Hilum (3–)4–5(–6) μm (on yellow apple), (3.5–)4–5(–6) μm (on red apple), 4–5(–6) μm (on Eriobotrya japonica) and 2.5–5 μm (on Pyracantha sp.) wide, truncate, unthickened to occasionally very slightly thickened, not darkened.

 

 

 

Fig. 3. Conidia and conidiophores of Fusicladium pomi on Malus pumila (A), on Pyracantha sp. (B) and on Eriobotrya japonica (C), F. pyrorum (D) and F. oleagineum (E). Scale bars = 10 μm.

 

 

Specimens examined: On fruit of Malus pumila: IRAN, Khalkhal, Ardabil Province, 8 Jul. 2011, R. Ebrahimi, (1010); IRAN, College of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Rasht, S. A. Khodaparast, (1011); IRAN, Eghbalieh, Qazvin, 17 Jul. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1013); IRAN, Eghbalieh,Takestan, Qazvin, 17 Jul. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1012); IRAN, fruit shop, Rasht, Guilan Province, 23 Jul. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1014); on fruit of red apple: IRAN, fruit shop, Rasht, Guilan Province, 14 Dec. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1030); on fruits of Pyracantha sp.: IRAN, College of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Rasht, 17 Oct. 2011, S.A.Hashemi, (1027); IRAN, College of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Rasht, 31 Oct. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1028); on leaves and fruits of Eriobotrya japonica: IRAN, Some-eh-sara, Guilan Province, 22 May 2007, S. A. Khodaparast, (1021); IRAN, Sarvelat, Guilan Province, 29 May 2009, S. A. Khodaparast, (1022); IRAN, Sost, Leisar, Hashtpar, Guilan Province, 25 Oct. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1023); IRAN, Ramsar, Mazandaran Province, 30 Dec. 2011, S.A. Elahinia, (1024).

Notes: Three Fusicladium species from Malus;
F. pomi, F. pyrorum and F. asperatum, are different by having percurrent or sympodial conidiogenous cells, different conidial size and possessing solitary or catenate conidia. Schubert et al. (2003) reduced Spilocaea amelanchieris, S. eriobotryae, S. photinicola and S. pyracanthae to synonyms of Fusicladium pomi. This species has previously been reported from Iran as F. pomi (Spilocaea pomi) on Malus pumila and
F. eriobotryae (= Spilocaea pyracanthae) on Eriobotrya japonica (Ershad 2009, Askari & Ghaderi 2010) and here it is reported from yellow and red apple cultivars of Malus pumila, Eriobotrya japonica and Pyracantha sp. Some authors reported this species as F. eriobotryae on Eriobotrya japonica (Sánchez-Torres et al. 2009) and as F. pyracanthae on Pyracantha sp. (Raabe & Gardner 1972, Juhásováet al. 2004), but according to Schubert et al. (2003) all of them belong to F. pomi. Conidia from E. japonica and Pyracantha specimens are slightly, thought not significantly, shorter on average.Pyracantha sp. and red apple cultivar of Malus pumila are reported as new hosts for F. pomi in Iran. In this study, conidiophores on Pyracantha sp. are longer than those of the two other hosts. Conidia on Malus pumila are slightly longer than those of the two other hosts and hila from Pyracantha sp. are slightly shorter than others but, all of them fall in the range of F. pomi.

 

Fusicladium pyrorum (Lib.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 357 ‘1869’ (1870)             Fig. 1G-H, 3D

On fruits and leaves, leaf spots amphigenous, diffuse, sub-circular to somewhat irregular, olivaceous to dark brown, surrounded by a paler brown halo. Conidiophores solitary or in loose fascicles, erect, straight to flexuous, unbranched, 17–32 × 4–5 μm, and aseptate (on Pyrus communis), (12–)20–37(–41) × 5–8(–10) μm, (0–)1(–2) septate (on Khoj, a local varietyof Pyrus communis in Guilan Province), olivaceous, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal, 17–32 μm long (on Pyrus communis) and 9–25(–37) μm long (on Khoj), with numerous conidiogenous loci (2–4 loci on Pyrusc ommunisand 2–5(–10) loci on Khoj), proliferation sympodial, loci denticulate, 2(–3)μm wide (on Pyrus communis) and (1–)2–3(–4) μm wide (on Khoj), walls unthickened. Conidia solitary, fusiform to pyriform, ellipsoid to obovoid, straight, 14–26 × 6–7.5(–8) μm, 0(–1) septate (on Pyrus communis), (11–)13–23 × 8–10(–11) μm, 0(–1) septate (on Khoj), olivaceous, hila (1.5–)2(–4) μm wide (on Pyrus communis) and 2–3(–4) μm wide (on Khoj), unthickened or slightly thickened.

Specimens examined: On Pyrus communis:IRAN, Qazvin, S. A. Khodaparast, (1015); IRAN, Qazvin, 26 May 2011, S. A. Khodaparast, (1016); on Khoj fruits: IRAN, Lahijan, Guilan Province, 5 Jul. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1017); IRAN, Lahijan, Guilan Province, 21 Aug. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1018).

Notes: Fusicladium pyrorum occurs on some host species in the Rosaceae (Aronia, Chaenomeles, Eriobotrya, Malus and Pyrus) and except of
F. pyrorum other three species of Fusicladium occur on Pyrus (F. ahmadii, F. pomi and F. nashicola). These species differ in possessing percurrent or sympodial conidiogenous cells and specific host of Pyrus species (Schubert et al. 2003). In this study,
F. pyrorum on Khoj has broader conidiophores and conidia compared with specimens on Pyrus communis, but all of them fall in the range of F. pyrorum. The Khoj variety of Pyrus communis is reported as a new host of F. pyrorum in Iran.

 

Fusicladium oleagineum (Castagne) Ritschel & U. Braun, Schlechtendalia 9: 70 (2003) Fig. 1I, 3E

 

On living leaves, leaf spots 5–10 mm wide, dark to greyish brown. Mycelium mostly superficial. Conidiophores solitary, sub-globoseor ampulliform, 17–33(–37) × 7–13 μm, erect, straight, unbranched, mostly aseptate, usually thick-walled, conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells, with a single conidiogenous loci, proliferation percurrent, with 4–6(–7) conspicuous annellations, loci 5.5–6 μm wide, unthickened, not darkened. Conidia solitary, obclavate, straight or occasionally slightly curved, (16–)19–27(–29) × 8–11(–12) μm, 1(–2) septate, medium to dark olivaceous-brown, thick-walled, apex rounded, hila (5–)6(–7.5) μm wide, unthickened, not darkened.

Specimens examined: IRAN, Rice Research Institute, Rasht, Guilan Province, on leaves of Olea europaea, 25 Feb. 2011, N. Zareian, (1019); IRAN, Rice Research Institute, Rasht, Guilan Province, on leaves of Olea europaea, 12 Dec. 2011, S. A. Hashemi, (1020).

Notes: This species occurs only on Olea (Schubert et al. 2003) and is a common species in olive growing regions of Iran. Olive scab and its causal agent (F. oleagineum) have been studied previously in different locations of Iran such as Mazandaran, Golestan and Guilan Provinces, Iran (Mahdian 2006, Ershad 2009,Sanei & Razavi 2011).

Furthermore, three species of Fusicladium such as F. crataegi on Crataegus melanocarpa (from Gorgan, Iran), F. cerasi on Prunus domestica (from Babolsar & Borujerd, Iran) and F. heterosporum (and related teleomorph Venturia adusta) on Epilobium hirsutum (from Shahrestanak, Iran) have been reported from Iran (Ershad 2009, Hedjaroude & Abbasi 2000), but were not found in this study. Fusicladium heterosporum is already transferred to the genus Passalora (Schubert et al. 2003).

 

Key to Fusicladium species reported from Iran:

1.   Conidiogenous cells sympodial …………………. 2

1.   Conidiogenous cells percurrent …………………. 6                                                                                                      6

2.   Conidia catenate, conidiophores 29–105 μm long, conidia 12.5–20(–22) × 4–5 μm, on fruits of Prunus persica var. nectarine ………….... F. carpophilum

2.   Conidia not catenate or rarely in chains; if so conidia 0–1(–3)-septate………………...………... 3

3.   Conidia 1(–2), sometimes 3-septate …………...... 4

3.   Conidia 0–1-septate ……………………………... 5

4.   Conidiophores with distinct lobed foot cell, conidia 1(–2) septate, more or less thickened and darkened at septa, 14–18 × 5 μm, conidiophores 26–45 μm long, on Fraxinus sp. …………………... F. fraxini

4.   Conidiophores without distinct lobed foot cell, conidia 0–2 septate, 10–25 × 4–6 μm, conidiophores 20–54 μm long, on Crataegus spp.……………………………...…………. F. crataegi

5.   Conidia 0(–1)-septate, 13–26 × 6–10 μm, conidiophores 9–32 μm long, on Pyrus communis and Khoj (local cultivar of P. communisin Guilan Province) ………………………...…... F. pyrurum

5.   Conidia solitary, rarely in chains, 0–1(–3)-septate, 11–25× 4–7μm,conidiophores (10–)20–40(–60) μm long, with narrow host range, mostly on Prunus cerasus …………………………...…...… F. cerasi

6.   Conidia usually without septa, 12–25 × 7–10 μm, conidiophores 10–58 μm long, on Malus sp., Pyracantha sp. and Eriobotrya japonica ….F. pomi

6.   Conidia 1(–2)-septate, 19–27 × 8–11 μm, conidiophores 17–33 μm long, on Olea sp. ………………………...…………... F. oleagineum

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 

We wish to thank Prof. Uwe Braun (Germany) who kindly sent the monograph of the genus Fusicladium to us.

Askari Sh, Ghaderi F. 2010. Study of black spot of apple in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad Province. 19th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 31 Jul.–3 Aug. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Iran. P. 291.
Beck A, Ritschel A, Schubert K, Braun U, Triebel D. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of the anamorphic genus Fusicladium s.l. as inferred by ITS nrDNA data. Mycological Progress: 111–116.
Braun U,Crous PW, Dugan F, Groenewald JZ, de Hoog GS. 2003. Phylogeny and taxonomy of Cladosporium-like hyphomycetes, including Davidiella gen. nov.the teleomorph of Cladosporium s.s. Mycological Progress: 3–18.
Braun U, Crous PW, Schubert K. 2008. Taxonomic revision of the genus Cladosporium s.l. 8. Reintroduction of Graphiopsis (= Dichocladosporium) with further reassessments of cladosporioid hyphomycetes. Mycotaxon 103: 207–216.
Braun U, Ritschel A, Schubert K. 2002. Proposal to conserve the generic name Fusicladium against Spilocaea (Hyphomycetes). Taxon 51: 557.
Braun U. 2005. Proposal to conserve Fusicladium against Cycloconium (Hyphomycetes). Taxon 54: 538.
Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Diederich P. 2010a. Fusicladium peltigericola Crous & Diederich, sp. nov. Persoonia 25: 128–129.
Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Shivas RG. 2010b. Fusicladium eucalypti Crous & R.G. Shivas, sp. nov. Persoonia 25: 148–149.
Crous PW, Schubert K, Braun U, de Hoog GS, Hocking AD, Shin HD, Groenewald JZ. 2007. Opportunistic, human-pathogenic species in the Herpotrichiellaceae are phenotypically similar to saprobic or phytopathogenic species in the Venturiaceae. Studies in Mycology 58: 185–217.
David, JC. 1997: A contribution to the systematics of Cladosporium. Revision of the fungi previously referred to Heterosporium. Mycological Papers 172: 1–157.
Ershad D. 2009. Fungi of iran. 3rd edn. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.
Esfandiari E. 1948a. Les charbons des céréales en Iran. Entomologie et Phytopathologie Appliquées 6-7: 48–68.
Hedjaroude GhA, Abbasi M. 2000. Study of micromycetes flora in Karaj region, Iran (1). Rostaniha 1:103–130.
Juhásová G, Ivanová H, AdamÈíková K, Kobza M, Èerevková A. 2004. Scab disease of firethorn at selected localities in Slovakia. Plant Protection Science 40: 42–48.
Khabiri E. 1952. Contribution à la mycoflore de ì Iran. Première liste. Revue de mycologie 17: 154–157.
Mahdian SA. 2006. Survey of olive leaf spot and evaluation of some olive cultivar resistance to Spilocaea oleaginea. 17th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 2-5 Sep. Karaj, Iran.
Mozaffarian V. 1998. A Dictionary of Iranian plant names. 2nd edn. Farhang Mo¢aser Publishers, Iran.
Raabe RD, Gardner MW. 1972. Scab of Pyracantha, Loquat, Toyon, and Kageneckia. Phytopathology 62: 914–916.
Sánchez-Torres P, Hinarejos R, Tuset JJ. 2009. Characterization and pathogenicity of Fusicladium eriobotryae, the fungal pathogen responsible for loquat scab. Plant Disease 93:1151–1157.
Sanei SJ, Razavi SE. 2011. Survey of Spilocaea oleagina, causal agent of olive leaf spot, in the north of Iran. Journal of Yeast and Fungal Research 2: 33–38.
Schubert K, Braun U. 2005a. Taxonomic revision of the genus Cladosporium s.l. 4. Species reallocated to AsperisporiumDischloridiumFusicladiumPassaloraPseudoasperisporium and Stenella. Fungal Diversity 20: 187–208.
Schubert K, Braun U. 2005b. Taxonomic revision of the genus Cladosporium s.l. 1. Species reallocated to FusicladiumParastenellaPassalora, Pseudocercospora and Stenella. Mycological Progress 4: 101–109.
Schubert K, Braun U. 2007. Taxonomic revision of the genus Cladosporium s.l. 6. New species, reallocations to and synonyms of CercosporaFusicladiumPassaloraSeptonema and Stenella. Nova Hedwigia 84: 189–208.
Schubert K, Ritschel A, Braun U. 2003. A monograph of Fusicladium s.l. (Hyphomycetes). Schlechtendalia 9: 1–132.
Schubert K. 2005. Taxonomic revision of the genus Cladosporium s.l. 3. A revision of Cladosporium species described by JJ Davis and HC Greene (WIS). Mycotaxon 92: 55–76.